On Thu, 26 May 2016 22:42:35 Andreas Müller wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Paul Eggleton > > <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 26 May 2016 22:18:34 Andreas Müller wrote: > >> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Paul Eggleton > >> > >> <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > >> > On Thu, 26 May 2016 13:46:21 Cliff Brake wrote: > >> >> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:23 AM, Maxin B. John <maxin.j...@intel.com> > > > > wrote: > >> >> > meta-java repo was moved to: > >> >> > git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-java > >> >> > > >> >> > Is it possible to update the list with that info? > >> >> > >> >> Done, thanks! > >> >> > >> >> https://github.com/cbrake/openembedded-admin/commit/51604da79ed5a02341 > >> >> 562 > >> >> a9b f254b3dd9dc71704 > >> > > >> > At some point it would be great if this script could be driven from the > >> > OE > >> > layer index rather than being a separate entity - then updates would > >> > largely be self-service for the maintainers, or at least they would > >> > only > >> > need to be done in one place. > >> > >> Maybe a bit off-topic but layer index should have some mechanism of > >> removing rotten layers. > > > > We've discussed this on-and-off at OE developer meetings for a while now. > > FWIW I can remove them manually - actually I just got around to deleting > > meta- picosam9 which has been unmaintained for years. > > > > Part of the problem though is determining what "rotten" actually means. > > Additionally, there's an element of leaving things around in case someone > > comes to fork/revive them again. We do show a "last updated" date but it > > would be good to figure out some other way of determining and indicating > > "layer health" - to date I don't think we've managed to figure out > > anything practical for that. > > At least meta-kf5 is a candidate. I think it has never worked and > meta-qt5-extra is (try give my best) - maintained.
Interesting - I hadn't seen that you're covering KDE in meta-qt5-extra. Johan, would you be OK with meta-kf5 being dropped in favour of what's in meta-qt5- extra? > What about meta-kde4? It seems Samuel has switched himself to "Inactive" - we probably need some kind of alert when the last active maintainer of a layer does that. For now I've at least added a note to the entry. Samuel, do you have any opinions on what we should do with the listing? Or anyone else? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
