On 17 February 2017 at 18:02, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) RSS is good thing. > > 2) The breakage wasn't caused by lack of maintainers (at least I don't > think that I or Joe were the bottleneck for integrating the fixes). > > 3) More maintainers doesn't mean more contributions from people actually > using now broken components, it's actually easier to just send a fix > than to be a maintainer of some layer just to be able to also merge > your fix yourself. > > 4) It doesn't look so dramatic if it turns out that 200 of those > blacklisted recipes weren't actually used by anyone still active in > OE ecosystem. > > 5) If someone wants to replace me as meta-oe maintainer, go ahead, it > stopped being fun for me long time ago, now it's just slightly annoying > routine which takes my free time I would rather invest in something > cooler > I'll probably reply to this properly when I'm not rushing between various things, but I want to make it clear that I think the work you (JaMa) has been doing on meta-oe is beyond legendary and I've no problem at all with that. I just wonder if it would be easier to deal with stale layers that nobody is actually using if they were separate repositories instead of being part of the meta-oe umbrella. But they're not my layers so I have no say, and obviously everyone else disagrees! :) Ross -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel