On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 2:59 AM Clément Péron <peron.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Khem,
>
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 at 20:32, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Drop 0001-Fix-build-on-riscv32.patch, its upstreamed
> > Forward port rest of the patches
> > Use OPENSSL_NO_ASM only for armv7+/aarch64
>
> Should we not also enable these flags?:
> GRPC_PYTHON_BUILD_SYSTEM_RE2
> GRPC_PYTHON_BUILD_SYSTEM_CARES
> GRPC_PYTHON_BUILD_SYSTEM_ZLIB
>
> To avoid building a different version of RE2/C-Ares of Zlib than the
> one built by the system ?
>
perhaps we should please test such a change and submit if it works
> Regards,
> Clement
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > v2: Fix wrong detection of platform
> >
> > .../0001-Fix-build-on-riscv32.patch | 65 --------------
> > ...-Do-not-mix-C-and-C-compiler-options.patch | 86 ++++++++++---------
> > .../python/python3-grpcio/boring_ssl.patch | 36 ++++++++
> > .../ppc-boringssl-support.patch | 4 +-
> > .../python3-grpcio/riscv64_support.patch | 4 +-
> > ...cio_1.27.1.bb => python3-grpcio_1.35.0.bb} | 20 +++--
> > 6 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644
> > meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio/0001-Fix-build-on-riscv32.patch
> > create mode 100644
> > meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio/boring_ssl.patch
> > rename meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/{python3-grpcio_1.27.1.bb =>
> > python3-grpcio_1.35.0.bb} (55%)
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio/0001-Fix-build-on-riscv32.patch
> >
> > b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio/0001-Fix-build-on-riscv32.patch
> > deleted file mode 100644
> > index 920fc1169d..0000000000
> > ---
> > a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio/0001-Fix-build-on-riscv32.patch
> > +++ /dev/null
> > @@ -1,65 +0,0 @@
> > -From 04e28fdda03b545a0f7b446a784ec2fa7249cbb8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > -From: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com>
> > -Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 15:37:40 -0700
> > -Subject: [PATCH] Fix build on riscv32
> > -
> > -Define __NR_mmap in terms of __NR_mmap2 and __NR_futex interms of
> > -__NR_futex_time64 for rv32, since there calls dont exist for rv32
> > -
> > -Also recognise rv32 as a new 32bit platform
> > -
> > -Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/pull/675]
> > -Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com>
> > ----
> > - absl/base/internal/direct_mmap.h | 5 +++++
> > - absl/base/internal/spinlock_linux.inc | 4 ++++
> > - absl/synchronization/internal/waiter.cc | 4 ++++
> > - 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > -
> > ---- a/third_party/abseil-cpp/absl/base/internal/direct_mmap.h
> > -+++ b/third_party/abseil-cpp/absl/base/internal/direct_mmap.h
> > -@@ -26,6 +26,10 @@
> > -
> > - #ifdef __linux__
> > -
> > -+#if !defined(__NR_mmap) && defined(__riscv) && __riscv_xlen == 32
> > -+# define __NR_mmap __NR_mmap2
> > -+#endif
> > -+
> > - #include <sys/types.h>
> > - #ifdef __BIONIC__
> > - #include <sys/syscall.h>
> > -@@ -72,6 +76,7 @@ inline void* DirectMmap(void* start, siz
> > - #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__ARM_ARCH_3__) || defined(__ARM_EABI__)
> > || \
> > - (defined(__mips__) && _MIPS_SIM == _MIPS_SIM_ABI32) ||
> > \
> > - (defined(__PPC__) && !defined(__PPC64__)) ||
> > \
> > -+ (defined(__riscv) && __riscv_xlen == 32) ||
> > \
> > - (defined(__s390__) && !defined(__s390x__))
> > - // On these architectures, implement mmap with mmap2.
> > - static int pagesize = 0;
> > ---- a/third_party/abseil-cpp/absl/base/internal/spinlock_linux.inc
> > -+++ b/third_party/abseil-cpp/absl/base/internal/spinlock_linux.inc
> > -@@ -14,6 +14,10 @@
> > - //
> > - // This file is a Linux-specific part of spinlock_wait.cc
> > -
> > -+#if !defined(__NR_futex) && defined(__riscv) && __riscv_xlen == 32
> > -+# define __NR_futex __NR_futex_time64
> > -+#endif
> > -+
> > - #include <linux/futex.h>
> > - #include <sys/syscall.h>
> > - #include <unistd.h>
> > ---- a/third_party/abseil-cpp/absl/synchronization/internal/waiter.cc
> > -+++ b/third_party/abseil-cpp/absl/synchronization/internal/waiter.cc
> > -@@ -24,6 +24,10 @@
> > - #include <unistd.h>
> > - #endif
> > -
> > -+#if !defined(__NR_futex) && defined(__riscv) && __riscv_xlen == 32
> > -+# define __NR_futex __NR_futex_time64
> > -+#endif
> > -+
> > - #ifdef __linux__
> > - #include <linux/futex.h>
> > - #include <sys/syscall.h>
> > diff --git
> > a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio/0001-setup.py-Do-not-mix-C-and-C-compiler-options.patch
> >
> > b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio/0001-setup.py-Do-not-mix-C-and-C-compiler-options.patch
> > index bff50a0a11..373669461b 100644
> > ---
> > a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio/0001-setup.py-Do-not-mix-C-and-C-compiler-options.patch
> > +++
> > b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio/0001-setup.py-Do-not-mix-C-and-C-compiler-options.patch
> > @@ -1,26 +1,18 @@
> > -From 2ef8a85933f3ac36b289979ff9edd49dd12d0d16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > +From de10fbc2386dcac3ab810c49b6977b2ee01bf426 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com>
> > -Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 09:04:07 -0700
> > +Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 13:30:23 -0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] setup.py: Do not mix C and C++ compiler options
> >
> > EXTRA_ENV_COMPILE_ARGS is used both with CC and CXX
> > so using -std=c++11 or -std=gnu99 together will cause
> > build time errors espcially with clang
> >
> > -error: invalid argument '-std=gnu99' not allowed with 'C++'
> > -
> > -gcc7 ( defaults are -std=gnu11 and -std=gnu++14 )
> > - as well clang default to these standards mode or newer
> > -anyway
> > -
> > -Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com>
> > -
> > -1. Keep '-std=c++11' and '-std=gnu99' to fix native build error
> > +Keep '-std=c++11' to fix native build error
> > with old gcc (such as gcc 5.4.0 on ubuntu 16.04), for clang
> > we will remove them through GRPC_PYTHON_CFLAGS at do_compile
> > in bb recipe.
> >
> > -2. While export CC="gcc ", cc_args is None, it will
> > +While export CC="gcc ", cc_args is None, it will
> > cause subprocess.Popen always return 1. On centos 8, if you don't
> > install package libatomic, there will be a native build error
> > `cannot find /usr/lib64/libatomic.so.1.2.0'.
> > @@ -28,47 +20,57 @@ install package libatomic, there will be a native build
> > error
> > Add no harm '-g' to cc_args if cc_args is empty.
> >
> > Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [oe specific]
> > +
> > +Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia <hongxu....@windriver.com>
> > ---
> > - setup.py | 6 +++++-
> > + setup.py | 9 ++++++---
> > src/python/grpcio/commands.py | 5 ++++-
> > - 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > + 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/setup.py b/setup.py
> > -index e950057..1b68221 100644
> > +index 4b8c9d4..271b7b1 100644
> > --- a/setup.py
> > +++ b/setup.py
> > -@@ -144,9 +144,13 @@ ENABLE_DOCUMENTATION_BUILD = os.environ.get(
> > -
> > - def check_linker_need_libatomic():
> > - """Test if linker on system needs libatomic."""
> > -+ compiler, cc_args = os.environ.get('CC').split(' ', 1) or 'gcc'
> > -+ if not cc_args:
> > -+ cc_args = "-g"
> > +@@ -172,8 +172,11 @@ def check_linker_need_libatomic():
> > + """Test if linker on system needs libatomic."""
> > + code_test = (b'#include <atomic>\n' +
> > + b'int main() { return std::atomic<int64_t>{}; }')
> > +- cxx = os.environ.get('CXX', 'c++')
> > +- cpp_test = subprocess.Popen([cxx, '-x', 'c++', '-std=c++11', '-'],
> > ++ cxx, cxx_args = os.environ.get('CXX').split(' ', 1) or 'c++'
> > ++ if not cxx_args:
> > ++ cxx_args = "-g"
> > +
> > - code_test = (b'#include <atomic>\n' +
> > - b'int main() { return std::atomic<int64_t>{}; }')
> > -- cc_test = subprocess.Popen(['cc', '-x', 'c++', '-std=c++11', '-'],
> > -+ cc_test = subprocess.Popen([compiler, cc_args, '-x', 'c++',
> > '-std=c++11', '-'],
> > - stdin=PIPE,
> > - stdout=PIPE,
> > - stderr=PIPE)
> > ++ cpp_test = subprocess.Popen([cxx, cxx_args, '-x', 'c++',
> > '-std=c++11', '-'],
> > + stdin=PIPE,
> > + stdout=PIPE,
> > + stderr=PIPE)
> > +@@ -183,7 +186,7 @@ def check_linker_need_libatomic():
> > + # Double-check to see if -latomic actually can solve the problem.
> > + # https://github.com/grpc/grpc/issues/22491
> > + cpp_test = subprocess.Popen(
> > +- [cxx, '-x', 'c++', '-std=c++11', '-latomic', '-'],
> > ++ [cxx, cxx_args, '-x', 'c++', '-std=c++11', '-latomic', '-'],
> > + stdin=PIPE,
> > + stdout=PIPE,
> > + stderr=PIPE)
> > diff --git a/src/python/grpcio/commands.py b/src/python/grpcio/commands.py
> > -index 064dda9..a75d8b9 100644
> > +index a8b2ff5..b928201 100644
> > --- a/src/python/grpcio/commands.py
> > +++ b/src/python/grpcio/commands.py
> > -@@ -216,7 +216,10 @@ class BuildExt(build_ext.build_ext):
> > - when invoked in C mode. GCC is okay with this, while clang is
> > not.
> > +@@ -219,7 +219,10 @@ class BuildExt(build_ext.build_ext):
> > """
> > - # TODO(lidiz) Remove the generated a.out for success tests.
> > -- cc_test = subprocess.Popen(['cc', '-x', 'c', '-std=c++11',
> > '-'],
> > -+ compiler, cc_args = os.environ.get('CC').split(' ', 1) or
> > 'gcc'
> > -+ if not cc_args:
> > -+ cc_args = "-g"
> > -+ cc_test = subprocess.Popen([compiler, cc_args, '-x', 'c',
> > '-std=c++11', '-'],
> > - stdin=subprocess.PIPE,
> > - stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
> > - stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
> > + try:
> > + # TODO(lidiz) Remove the generated a.out for success
> > tests.
> > +- cc_test = subprocess.Popen(['cc', '-x', 'c',
> > '-std=c++11', '-'],
> > ++ cc_test, cc_args = os.environ.get('CC').split(' ', 1) or
> > 'gcc'
> > ++ if not cc_args:
> > ++ cc_args = "-g"
> > ++ cc_test = subprocess.Popen([cc_test, cc_args, '-x', 'c',
> > '-std=c++11', '-'],
> > + stdin=subprocess.PIPE,
> > + stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
> > + stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
> > --
> > -2.7.4
> > +2.30.1
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio/boring_ssl.patch
> > b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio/boring_ssl.patch
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..65db4a6ed4
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio/boring_ssl.patch
> > @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> > +Do not poke at the build machine to determine target platform or
> > architecture
> > +pass it from environment instead for cross compiling to work
> > +
> > +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [OE-Specific]
> > +Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com>
> > +--- a/setup.py
> > ++++ b/setup.py
> > +@@ -109,6 +109,8 @@ CLASSIFIERS = [
> > + BUILD_WITH_BORING_SSL_ASM =
> > os.environ.get('GRPC_BUILD_WITH_BORING_SSL_ASM',
> > + True)
> > +
> > ++BORING_SSL_PLATFORM = os.environ.get('GRPC_BORING_SSL_PLATFORM',
> > ++ True)
> > + # Environment variable to determine whether or not the Cython extension
> > should
> > + # *use* Cython or use the generated C files. Note that this requires the
> > C files
> > + # to have been generated by building first *with* Cython support. Even if
> > this
> > +@@ -306,15 +308,15 @@ asm_key = ''
> > + if BUILD_WITH_BORING_SSL_ASM and not BUILD_WITH_SYSTEM_OPENSSL:
> > + LINUX_X86_64 = 'linux-x86_64'
> > + LINUX_ARM = 'linux-arm'
> > +- if LINUX_X86_64 == util.get_platform():
> > ++ if LINUX_X86_64 == BORING_SSL_PLATFORM:
> > + asm_key = 'crypto_linux_x86_64'
> > +- elif LINUX_ARM == util.get_platform():
> > ++ elif LINUX_ARM == BORING_SSL_PLATFORM:
> > + asm_key = 'crypto_linux_arm'
> > +- elif "mac" in util.get_platform() and "x86_64" in util.get_platform():
> > ++ elif "mac" in BORING_SSL_PLATFORM and "x86_64" in BORING_SSL_PLATFORM:
> > + asm_key = 'crypto_mac_x86_64'
> > + else:
> > + print("ASM Builds for BoringSSL currently not supported on:",
> > +- util.get_platform())
> > ++ BORING_SSL_PLATFORM)
> > + if asm_key:
> > + asm_files = grpc_core_dependencies.ASM_SOURCE_FILES[asm_key]
> > + else:
> > diff --git
> > a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio/ppc-boringssl-support.patch
> >
> > b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio/ppc-boringssl-support.patch
> > index 8ac2aef8c4..dadd3da85e 100644
> > ---
> > a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio/ppc-boringssl-support.patch
> > +++
> > b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio/ppc-boringssl-support.patch
> > @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ Let boringSSL compile on ppc32 bit
> > Upstream-Status: Pending
> > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com>
> >
> > ---- a/third_party/boringssl/include/openssl/base.h
> > -+++ b/third_party/boringssl/include/openssl/base.h
> > +--- a/third_party/boringssl-with-bazel/src/include/openssl/base.h
> > ++++ b/third_party/boringssl-with-bazel/src/include/openssl/base.h
> > @@ -99,6 +99,9 @@ extern "C" {
> > #elif (defined(__PPC64__) || defined(__powerpc64__)) &&
> > defined(_LITTLE_ENDIAN)
> > #define OPENSSL_64_BIT
> > diff --git
> > a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio/riscv64_support.patch
> > b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio/riscv64_support.patch
> > index 8c9ffa21b7..7e071ae1e6 100644
> > ---
> > a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio/riscv64_support.patch
> > +++
> > b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio/riscv64_support.patch
> > @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ Add RISC-V 64bit support
> >
> > Upstream-Status: Pending
> > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com>
> > ---- a/third_party/boringssl/include/openssl/base.h
> > -+++ b/third_party/boringssl/include/openssl/base.h
> > +--- a/third_party/boringssl-with-bazel/src/include/openssl/base.h
> > ++++ b/third_party/boringssl-with-bazel/src/include/openssl/base.h
> > @@ -108,6 +108,14 @@ extern "C" {
> > #elif defined(__mips__) && defined(__LP64__)
> > #define OPENSSL_64_BIT
> > diff --git a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio_1.27.1.bb
> > b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio_1.35.0.bb
> > similarity index 55%
> > rename from meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio_1.27.1.bb
> > rename to meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio_1.35.0.bb
> > index 129bb35bcc..2c137f6ce7 100644
> > --- a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio_1.27.1.bb
> > +++ b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-grpcio_1.35.0.bb
> > @@ -9,10 +9,9 @@ DEPENDS += "${PYTHON_PN}-protobuf"
> > SRC_URI += "file://0001-setup.py-Do-not-mix-C-and-C-compiler-options.patch"
> > SRC_URI_append_class-target = " file://ppc-boringssl-support.patch \
> > file://riscv64_support.patch \
> > - file://0001-Fix-build-on-riscv32.patch \
> > + file://boring_ssl.patch \
> > "
> > -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "ccaf4e7eb4f031d926fb80035d193b98"
> > -SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
> > "a899725d34769a498ecd3be154021c4368dd22bdc69473f6ec46779696f626c4"
> > +SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
> > "7bd0ebbb14dde78bf66a1162efd29d3393e4e943952e2f339757aa48a184645c"
> >
> > RDEPENDS_${PN} = "${PYTHON_PN}-protobuf \
> > ${PYTHON_PN}-setuptools \
> > @@ -24,9 +23,18 @@ inherit pypi
> >
> > export GRPC_PYTHON_DISABLE_LIBC_COMPATIBILITY = "1"
> >
> > -do_compile_prepend_toolchain-clang() {
> > - export GRPC_PYTHON_CFLAGS='-fvisibility=hidden -fno-wrapv
> > -fno-exceptions'
> > -}
> > +BORING_SSL_PLATFORM_arm = "linux-arm"
> > +BORING_SSL_PLATFORM_x86-64 = "linux-x86_64"
> > +BORING_SSL_PLATFORM ?= "unsupported"
> > +export GRPC_BORING_SSL_PLATFORM = "${BORING_SSL_PLATFORM}"
> > +
> > +BORING_SSL_x86-64 = "1"
> > +BORING_SSL_arm = "1"
> > +BORING_SSL ?= "0"
> > +export GRPC_BUILD_WITH_BORING_SSL_ASM = "${BORING_SSL}"
> > +
> > +GRPC_CFLAGS_append_toolchain-clang = " -fvisibility=hidden -fno-wrapv
> > -fno-exceptions"
> > +export GRPC_PYTHON_CFLAGS = "${GRPC_CFLAGS}"
> >
> > CLEANBROKEN = "1"
> >
> > --
> > 2.30.1
> >
> >
> >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#89682):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/89682
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/80738515/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-devel+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
