I've sent them now (on top of your 4 patches). Some stats from meta-oe layers:
meta-oe Total patches found: 1230 meta-networking Total patches found: 496 meta-python Total patches found: 106 meta-multimedia Total patches found: 82 meta-initramfs Total patches found: 60 meta-gnome Total patches found: 55 meta-filesystems Total patches found: 43 meta-webserver Total patches found: 40 meta-xfce Total patches found: 18 meta-perl Total patches found: 12 meta-filesystems Patches missing Signed-off-by: 4 (9%) meta-filesystems Patches missing Upstream-Status: 13 (30%) meta-filesystems Patches in Pending state: 10 (23%) meta-gnome Patches missing Signed-off-by: 4 (7%) meta-gnome Patches missing Upstream-Status: 6 (11%) meta-gnome Patches in Pending state: 15 (27%) meta-initramfs Patches missing Signed-off-by: 4 (7%) meta-initramfs Patches missing Upstream-Status: 20 (33%) meta-initramfs Patches in Pending state: 6 (10%) meta-multimedia Patches missing Signed-off-by: 11 (13%) meta-multimedia Patches missing Upstream-Status: 19 (23%) meta-multimedia Patches in Pending state: 27 (33%) meta-networking Patches missing Signed-off-by: 66 (13%) meta-networking Patches missing CVE: 2 (0%) meta-networking Patches missing Upstream-Status: 130 (26%) meta-networking Patches in Pending state: 188 (38%) meta-oe Patches missing Signed-off-by: 226 (18%) meta-oe Patches missing CVE: 5 (0%) meta-oe Patches missing Upstream-Status: 381 (31%) meta-oe Patches in Pending state: 370 (30%) meta-perl Patches missing Signed-off-by: 1 (8%) meta-perl Patches missing Upstream-Status: 1 (8%) meta-perl Patches in Pending state: 6 (50%) meta-python Patches missing Signed-off-by: 9 (8%) meta-python Patches missing CVE: 2 (2%) meta-python Patches missing Upstream-Status: 20 (19%) meta-python Patches in Pending state: 30 (28%) meta-webserver Patches missing Signed-off-by: 12 (30%) meta-webserver Patches missing Upstream-Status: 9 (22%) meta-webserver Patches in Pending state: 13 (32%) meta-xfce Patches missing Upstream-Status: 2 (11%) meta-xfce Patches in Pending state: 4 (22%) If someone really wants I can add Upstream-Status: Pending to .patches without any Upstream-Status (I already have oneliner to do that), but that just replaces missing with Pending without adding any other value (other than avoiding warnings from the QA check). But I also don't expect the regular contributors to be able to add missing Upstream-Status in remaining 30% patches anytime soon. Cheers, On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 2:12 PM Martin Jansa via lists.openembedded.org <Martin.Jansa=gmail....@lists.openembedded.org> wrote: > Be aware that with: > > https://patchwork.yoctoproject.org/project/oe-core/patch/20230215172041.636292-3-martin.ja...@gmail.com/ > > meta-oe layers have 81 malformed Upstream-Status entries (before your > patches are applied), so there are many more cases. > > But I agree that if it's included, it should be in the right format, > because other people might copy&paste it to other new .patch files as well. > > I can send fixes for the rest. > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 1:41 PM Yi Zhao <yi.z...@eng.windriver.com> wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Yi Zhao <yi.z...@windriver.com> >> --- >> .../0001-server-Adjust-the-cache-alignment-assumptions.patch | 2 +- >> .../obexftp/obexftp/Remove_some_printf_in_obexftpd.patch | 2 +- >> .../lshw/files/0001-disable-docbook2man.patch | 2 +- >> .../fluentbit/0003-mbedtls-Do-not-overwrite-CFLAGS.patch | 2 +- >> ...rust.configure-do-not-try-to-find-a-suitable-upstrea.patch | 2 +- >> .../lxdm/lxdm/0004-fix-css-under-gtk-3.20.patch | 4 +--- >> .../hddtemp/hddtemp/hddtemp_0.3-beta15-52.diff | 2 +- >> .../libb64/libb64/0001-example-Do-not-run-the-tests.patch | 2 +- >> ...configure.ac-do-additional-checks-on-libxml2-also-wh.patch | 4 +--- >> .../sharutils/sharutils/CVE-2018-1000097.patch | 2 +- >> 10 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git >> a/meta-oe/dynamic-layers/meta-python/recipes-dbs/mongodb/mongodb/0001-server-Adjust-the-cache-alignment-assumptions.patch >> b/meta-oe/dynamic-layers/meta-python/recipes-dbs/mongodb/mongodb/0001-server-Adjust-the-cache-alignment-assumptions.patch >> index bf083c85f..52c9df9b1 100644 >> --- >> a/meta-oe/dynamic-layers/meta-python/recipes-dbs/mongodb/mongodb/0001-server-Adjust-the-cache-alignment-assumptions.patch >> +++ >> b/meta-oe/dynamic-layers/meta-python/recipes-dbs/mongodb/mongodb/0001-server-Adjust-the-cache-alignment-assumptions.patch >> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ src/mongo/db/stats/counters.h:185:47: error: static >> assertion failed: cache line >> The structure need to ensure true sharing for both the elements >> so align it to hardware_constructive_interference_size instead >> >> -Upstream-Status: Reported [https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-65664] >> +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [ >> https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-65664] >> >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> >> --- >> diff --git >> a/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/obexftp/obexftp/Remove_some_printf_in_obexftpd.patch >> b/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/obexftp/obexftp/Remove_some_printf_in_obexftpd.patch >> index 8b73af32e..23e92885e 100644 >> --- >> a/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/obexftp/obexftp/Remove_some_printf_in_obexftpd.patch >> +++ >> b/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/obexftp/obexftp/Remove_some_printf_in_obexftpd.patch >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ >> Signed-off-by: Jun Zhu <r01...@freescale.com> >> >> -Upstream-Status: Not applicable >> +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [embedded specific] >> >> diff -Nru obexftp-0.23/apps.orig/obexftpd.c obexftp-0.23/apps/obexftpd.c >> --- obexftp-0.23/apps.orig/obexftpd.c 2013-11-08 10:42:20.816631583 >> +0800 >> diff --git >> a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/lshw/files/0001-disable-docbook2man.patch >> b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/lshw/files/0001-disable-docbook2man.patch >> index 00f7b8674..706f2d524 100644 >> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/lshw/files/0001-disable-docbook2man.patch >> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/lshw/files/0001-disable-docbook2man.patch >> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Subject: [PATCH] build: Do not build .sgml file >> >> It needs docbook2man tool which we do not have recipe for >> >> -Upstream-Status: OE-Specific [needs native docbook2man tool] >> +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [needs native docbook2man tool] >> >> Signed-off-by: Jose Quaresma <jose.quare...@foundries.io> >> --- >> diff --git >> a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/fluentbit/fluentbit/0003-mbedtls-Do-not-overwrite-CFLAGS.patch >> b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/fluentbit/fluentbit/0003-mbedtls-Do-not-overwrite-CFLAGS.patch >> index 6c585c2f5..158857ae2 100644 >> --- >> a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/fluentbit/fluentbit/0003-mbedtls-Do-not-overwrite-CFLAGS.patch >> +++ >> b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/fluentbit/fluentbit/0003-mbedtls-Do-not-overwrite-CFLAGS.patch >> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ bitbake passes CFLAGS that are often in conflict with the >> ones set >> in mbedtls' CMakeLists.txt. Such conflicts are the inability to use >> FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 except in release mode >> >> -Upstream-Status: Innapropriate [due to fluent-bit having it's own >> Release flags that also overwrite bitbake ones.] >> +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [due to fluent-bit having it's own >> Release flags that also overwrite bitbake ones.] >> --- >> lib/mbedtls-2.28.0/CMakeLists.txt | 2 -- >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >> diff --git >> a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/mozjs/mozjs-102/0003-rust.configure-do-not-try-to-find-a-suitable-upstrea.patch >> b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/mozjs/mozjs-102/0003-rust.configure-do-not-try-to-find-a-suitable-upstrea.patch >> index e63b05356..202f12612 100644 >> --- >> a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/mozjs/mozjs-102/0003-rust.configure-do-not-try-to-find-a-suitable-upstrea.patch >> +++ >> b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/mozjs/mozjs-102/0003-rust.configure-do-not-try-to-find-a-suitable-upstrea.patch >> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Subject: [PATCH] rust.configure: do not try to find a >> suitable upstream target >> >> OE is using custom targets and so this is bound to fail. >> >> -Upstream-Status: Inapppropriate [oe-core specific] >> +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [oe-core specific] >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <a...@linutronix.de> >> >> --- >> diff --git >> a/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/lxdm/lxdm/0004-fix-css-under-gtk-3.20.patch >> b/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/lxdm/lxdm/0004-fix-css-under-gtk-3.20.patch >> index afe11f353..d232f6913 100644 >> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/lxdm/lxdm/0004-fix-css-under-gtk-3.20.patch >> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/lxdm/lxdm/0004-fix-css-under-gtk-3.20.patch >> @@ -3,9 +3,7 @@ From: dgod <dgod....@gmail.com> >> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 19:25:25 +0800 >> Subject: [PATCH] fix css under gtk 3.20 >> >> -Upstream-Status: Applied [1] >> - >> -[1] >> https://git.lxde.org/gitweb/?p=lxde/lxdm.git;a=patch;h=72812894cfd9454d70e4b0753531e46580416771 >> +Upstream-Status >> <https://git.lxde.org/gitweb/?p=lxde/lxdm.git;a=patch;h=72812894cfd9454d70e4b0753531e46580416771+Upstream-Status>: >> Backport [ >> https://git.lxde.org/gitweb/?p=lxde/lxdm.git;a=patch;h=72812894cfd9454d70e4b0753531e46580416771 >> ] >> --- >> data/themes/Industrial/gtk.css | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> diff --git >> a/meta-oe/recipes-support/hddtemp/hddtemp/hddtemp_0.3-beta15-52.diff >> b/meta-oe/recipes-support/hddtemp/hddtemp/hddtemp_0.3-beta15-52.diff >> index 057b1fd1d..60953381a 100644 >> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-support/hddtemp/hddtemp/hddtemp_0.3-beta15-52.diff >> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-support/hddtemp/hddtemp/hddtemp_0.3-beta15-52.diff >> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Filtered with: >> filterdiff -p1 -x README -x 'debian/*' >> >> >> -Upstream-Status: unmaintained >> +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [unmaintained] >> >> Index: hddtemp-0.3-beta15/doc/hddtemp.8 >> =================================================================== >> diff --git >> a/meta-oe/recipes-support/libb64/libb64/0001-example-Do-not-run-the-tests.patch >> b/meta-oe/recipes-support/libb64/libb64/0001-example-Do-not-run-the-tests.patch >> index ea3ddfb64..b3ee24d9d 100644 >> --- >> a/meta-oe/recipes-support/libb64/libb64/0001-example-Do-not-run-the-tests.patch >> +++ >> b/meta-oe/recipes-support/libb64/libb64/0001-example-Do-not-run-the-tests.patch >> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ From: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> >> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 21:41:04 -0700 >> Subject: [PATCH] example: Do not run the tests >> >> -Upstream-Status: Inappropritate [Cross-compile specific] >> +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [Cross-compile specific] >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> >> --- >> examples/Makefile | 3 --- >> diff --git >> a/meta-oe/recipes-support/raptor2/files/0001-configure.ac-do-additional-checks-on-libxml2-also-wh.patch >> b/meta-oe/recipes-support/raptor2/files/0001-configure.ac-do-additional-checks-on-libxml2-also-wh.patch >> index 7faeb130a..490b61f1f 100644 >> --- >> a/meta-oe/recipes-support/raptor2/files/0001-configure.ac-do-additional-checks-on-libxml2-also-wh.patch >> +++ >> b/meta-oe/recipes-support/raptor2/files/0001-configure.ac-do-additional-checks-on-libxml2-also-wh.patch >> @@ -7,9 +7,7 @@ MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit >> >> -Upstream-Status: Applied [1] >> - >> -[1] https://github.com/dajobe/raptor/pull/33 >> +Upstream-Status: Backport [ >> https://github.com/dajobe/raptor/commit/e75b1dbb7f2a6514b8d391b200c45a2bec6268bf >> ] >> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzelt...@googlemail.com> >> --- >> diff --git >> a/meta-oe/recipes-support/sharutils/sharutils/CVE-2018-1000097.patch >> b/meta-oe/recipes-support/sharutils/sharutils/CVE-2018-1000097.patch >> index 99dc4e304..47eb9cfd6 100644 >> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-support/sharutils/sharutils/CVE-2018-1000097.patch >> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-support/sharutils/sharutils/CVE-2018-1000097.patch >> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ This was reported in >> <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-utils/2018-02/msg00004.html>. >> >> CVE: CVE-2018-1000097 >> -Upstream-Status: no upstream [ >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-utils/2018-02/msg00004.html] >> +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [no upstream] >> Signed-off-by: Petr Písař <ppi...@redhat.com> >> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <ok...@kernel.org> >> --- >> -- >> 2.25.1 >> >> >> >> >> > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#101231): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/101231 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/97181611/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-devel+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
