From: Narpat Mali <narpat.m...@windriver.com>

CVE-2023-38802:
FRRouting FRR 7.5.1 through 9.0 and Pica8 PICOS 4.3.3.2 allow a remote
attacker to cause a denial of service via a crafted BGP update with a
corrupted attribute 23 (Tunnel Encapsulation).

CVE-2023-41358:
An issue was discovered in FRRouting FRR through 9.0. bgpd/bgp_packet.c
processes NLRIs if the attribute length is zero.

References:
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-38802
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-41358

Signed-off-by: Narpat Mali <narpat.m...@windriver.com>
---
 .../frr/frr/CVE-2023-38802.patch              | 136 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../frr/frr/CVE-2023-41358.patch              | 105 ++++++++++++++
 .../recipes-protocols/frr/frr_8.2.2.bb        |   2 +
 3 files changed, 243 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 
meta-networking/recipes-protocols/frr/frr/CVE-2023-38802.patch
 create mode 100644 
meta-networking/recipes-protocols/frr/frr/CVE-2023-41358.patch

diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-protocols/frr/frr/CVE-2023-38802.patch 
b/meta-networking/recipes-protocols/frr/frr/CVE-2023-38802.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..60801bf06e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-networking/recipes-protocols/frr/frr/CVE-2023-38802.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+From ad32e04f3db364694edc678327326ae6b771db9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Donatas Abraitis <dona...@opensourcerouting.org>
+Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 11:30:53 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH 1/2] bgpd: Use treat-as-withdraw for tunnel encapsulation
+ attribute
+
+Before this path we used session reset method, which is discouraged by rfc7606.
+
+Handle this as rfc requires.
+
+Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <dona...@opensourcerouting.org>
+
+CVE: CVE-2023-38802
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport 
[https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/commit/bcb6b58d9530173df41d3a3cbc4c600ee0b4b186]
+
+Signed-off-by: Narpat Mali <narpat.m...@windriver.com>
+---
+ bgpd/bgp_attr.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
+ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/bgpd/bgp_attr.c b/bgpd/bgp_attr.c
+index 5d06991e2..b10a60351 100644
+--- a/bgpd/bgp_attr.c
++++ b/bgpd/bgp_attr.c
+@@ -1310,6 +1310,7 @@ bgp_attr_malformed(struct bgp_attr_parser_args *args, 
uint8_t subcode,
+       case BGP_ATTR_LARGE_COMMUNITIES:
+       case BGP_ATTR_ORIGINATOR_ID:
+       case BGP_ATTR_CLUSTER_LIST:
++      case BGP_ATTR_ENCAP:
+               return BGP_ATTR_PARSE_WITHDRAW;
+       case BGP_ATTR_MP_REACH_NLRI:
+       case BGP_ATTR_MP_UNREACH_NLRI:
+@@ -2411,26 +2412,21 @@ bgp_attr_ipv6_ext_communities(struct 
bgp_attr_parser_args *args)
+ }
+
+ /* Parse Tunnel Encap attribute in an UPDATE */
+-static int bgp_attr_encap(uint8_t type, struct peer *peer, /* IN */
+-                        bgp_size_t length, /* IN: attr's length field */
+-                        struct attr *attr, /* IN: caller already allocated */
+-                        uint8_t flag,      /* IN: attr's flags field */
+-                        uint8_t *startp)
++static int bgp_attr_encap(struct bgp_attr_parser_args *args)
+ {
+-      bgp_size_t total;
+       uint16_t tunneltype = 0;
+-
+-      total = length + (CHECK_FLAG(flag, BGP_ATTR_FLAG_EXTLEN) ? 4 : 3);
++      struct peer *const peer = args->peer;
++      struct attr *const attr = args->attr;
++      bgp_size_t length = args->length;
++      uint8_t type = args->type;
++      uint8_t flag = args->flags;
+
+       if (!CHECK_FLAG(flag, BGP_ATTR_FLAG_TRANS)
+           || !CHECK_FLAG(flag, BGP_ATTR_FLAG_OPTIONAL)) {
+-              zlog_info(
+-                      "Tunnel Encap attribute flag isn't optional and 
transitive %d",
+-                      flag);
+-              bgp_notify_send_with_data(peer, BGP_NOTIFY_UPDATE_ERR,
+-                                        BGP_NOTIFY_UPDATE_ATTR_FLAG_ERR,
+-                                        startp, total);
+-              return -1;
++              zlog_err("Tunnel Encap attribute flag isn't optional and 
transitive %d",
++                       flag);
++              return bgp_attr_malformed(args, BGP_NOTIFY_UPDATE_OPT_ATTR_ERR,
++                                        args->total);
+       }
+
+       if (BGP_ATTR_ENCAP == type) {
+@@ -2438,12 +2434,11 @@ static int bgp_attr_encap(uint8_t type, struct peer 
*peer, /* IN */
+               uint16_t tlv_length;
+
+               if (length < 4) {
+-                      zlog_info(
++                      zlog_err(
+                               "Tunnel Encap attribute not long enough to 
contain outer T,L");
+-                      bgp_notify_send_with_data(
+-                              peer, BGP_NOTIFY_UPDATE_ERR,
+-                              BGP_NOTIFY_UPDATE_OPT_ATTR_ERR, startp, total);
+-                      return -1;
++                      return bgp_attr_malformed(args,
++                                                
BGP_NOTIFY_UPDATE_OPT_ATTR_ERR,
++                                                args->total);
+               }
+               tunneltype = stream_getw(BGP_INPUT(peer));
+               tlv_length = stream_getw(BGP_INPUT(peer));
+@@ -2473,13 +2468,11 @@ static int bgp_attr_encap(uint8_t type, struct peer 
*peer, /* IN */
+               }
+
+               if (sublength > length) {
+-                      zlog_info(
+-                              "Tunnel Encap attribute sub-tlv length %d 
exceeds remaining length %d",
+-                              sublength, length);
+-                      bgp_notify_send_with_data(
+-                              peer, BGP_NOTIFY_UPDATE_ERR,
+-                              BGP_NOTIFY_UPDATE_OPT_ATTR_ERR, startp, total);
+-                      return -1;
++                      zlog_err("Tunnel Encap attribute sub-tlv length %d 
exceeds remaining length %d",
++                               sublength, length);
++                      return bgp_attr_malformed(args,
++                                                
BGP_NOTIFY_UPDATE_OPT_ATTR_ERR,
++                                                args->total);
+               }
+
+               /* alloc and copy sub-tlv */
+@@ -2527,13 +2520,10 @@ static int bgp_attr_encap(uint8_t type, struct peer 
*peer, /* IN */
+
+       if (length) {
+               /* spurious leftover data */
+-              zlog_info(
+-                      "Tunnel Encap attribute length is bad: %d leftover 
octets",
+-                      length);
+-              bgp_notify_send_with_data(peer, BGP_NOTIFY_UPDATE_ERR,
+-                                        BGP_NOTIFY_UPDATE_OPT_ATTR_ERR,
+-                                        startp, total);
+-              return -1;
++              zlog_err("Tunnel Encap attribute length is bad: %d leftover 
octets",
++                       length);
++              return bgp_attr_malformed(args, BGP_NOTIFY_UPDATE_OPT_ATTR_ERR,
++                                        args->total);
+       }
+
+       return 0;
+@@ -3332,8 +3322,7 @@ bgp_attr_parse_ret_t bgp_attr_parse(struct peer *peer, 
struct attr *attr,
+               case BGP_ATTR_VNC:
+ #endif
+               case BGP_ATTR_ENCAP:
+-                      ret = bgp_attr_encap(type, peer, length, attr, flag,
+-                                           startp);
++                      ret = bgp_attr_encap(&attr_args);
+                       break;
+               case BGP_ATTR_PREFIX_SID:
+                       ret = bgp_attr_prefix_sid(&attr_args);
+--
+2.40.0
diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-protocols/frr/frr/CVE-2023-41358.patch 
b/meta-networking/recipes-protocols/frr/frr/CVE-2023-41358.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e10d3e5267
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-networking/recipes-protocols/frr/frr/CVE-2023-41358.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+From ef9b66e742f9016b3bf283920b528cf20d2c969f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Donatas Abraitis <dona...@opensourcerouting.org>
+Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 11:36:13 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH 2/2] bgpd: Do not process NLRIs if the attribute length is
+ zero
+
+```
+3  0x00007f423aa42476 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=11) at 
../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:26
+4  0x00007f423aef9740 in core_handler (signo=11, siginfo=0x7fffc414deb0, 
context=<optimized out>) at lib/sigevent.c:246
+5  <signal handler called>
+6  0x0000564dea2fc71e in route_set_aspath_prepend (rule=0x564debd66d50, 
prefix=0x7fffc414ea30, object=0x7fffc414e400)
+    at bgpd/bgp_routemap.c:2258
+7  0x00007f423aeec7e0 in route_map_apply_ext (map=<optimized out>, 
prefix=prefix@entry=0x7fffc414ea30,
+    match_object=match_object@entry=0x7fffc414e400, 
set_object=set_object@entry=0x7fffc414e400, pref=pref@entry=0x0) at 
lib/routemap.c:2690
+8  0x0000564dea2d277e in bgp_input_modifier (peer=peer@entry=0x7f4238f59010, 
p=p@entry=0x7fffc414ea30, attr=attr@entry=0x7fffc414e770,
+    afi=afi@entry=AFI_IP, safi=safi@entry=SAFI_UNICAST, 
rmap_name=rmap_name@entry=0x0, label=0x0, num_labels=0, dest=0x564debdd5130)
+    at bgpd/bgp_route.c:1772
+9  0x0000564dea2df762 in bgp_update (peer=peer@entry=0x7f4238f59010, 
p=p@entry=0x7fffc414ea30, addpath_id=addpath_id@entry=0,
+    attr=0x7fffc414eb50, afi=afi@entry=AFI_IP, safi=<optimized out>, 
safi@entry=SAFI_UNICAST, type=9, sub_type=0, prd=0x0, label=0x0,
+    num_labels=0, soft_reconfig=0, evpn=0x0) at bgpd/bgp_route.c:4374
+10 0x0000564dea2e2047 in bgp_nlri_parse_ip (peer=0x7f4238f59010, 
attr=attr@entry=0x7fffc414eb50, packet=0x7fffc414eaf0)
+    at bgpd/bgp_route.c:6249
+11 0x0000564dea2c5a58 in bgp_nlri_parse (peer=peer@entry=0x7f4238f59010, 
attr=attr@entry=0x7fffc414eb50,
+    packet=packet@entry=0x7fffc414eaf0, mp_withdraw=mp_withdraw@entry=false) 
at bgpd/bgp_packet.c:339
+12 0x0000564dea2c5d66 in bgp_update_receive (peer=peer@entry=0x7f4238f59010, 
size=size@entry=109) at bgpd/bgp_packet.c:2024
+13 0x0000564dea2c901d in bgp_process_packet (thread=<optimized out>) at 
bgpd/bgp_packet.c:2933
+14 0x00007f423af0bf71 in event_call (thread=thread@entry=0x7fffc414ee40) at 
lib/event.c:1995
+15 0x00007f423aebb198 in frr_run (master=0x564deb73c670) at lib/libfrr.c:1213
+16 0x0000564dea261b83 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at 
bgpd/bgp_main.c:505
+```
+
+With the configuration:
+
+```
+frr version 9.1-dev-MyOwnFRRVersion
+frr defaults traditional
+hostname ip-172-31-13-140
+log file /tmp/debug.log
+log syslog
+service integrated-vtysh-config
+!
+debug bgp keepalives
+debug bgp neighbor-events
+debug bgp updates in
+debug bgp updates out
+!
+router bgp 100
+ bgp router-id 9.9.9.9
+ no bgp ebgp-requires-policy
+ bgp bestpath aigp
+ neighbor 172.31.2.47 remote-as 200
+ !
+ address-family ipv4 unicast
+  neighbor 172.31.2.47 default-originate
+  neighbor 172.31.2.47 route-map RM_IN in
+ exit-address-family
+exit
+!
+route-map RM_IN permit 10
+ set as-path prepend 200
+exit
+!
+```
+
+The issue is that we try to process NLRIs even if the attribute length is 0.
+
+Later bgp_update() will handle route-maps and a crash occurs because all the
+attributes are NULL, including aspath, where we dereference.
+
+According to the RFC 4271:
+
+A value of 0 indicates that neither the Network Layer
+         Reachability Information field nor the Path Attribute field is
+         present in this UPDATE message.
+
+But with a fuzzed UPDATE message this can be faked. I think it's reasonable
+to skip processing NLRIs if both update_len and attribute_len are 0.
+
+Reported-by: Iggy Frankovic <iggyf...@amazon.com>
+Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <dona...@opensourcerouting.org>
+
+CVE: CVE-2023-41358
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport 
[https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/14260/commits/28ccc24d38df1d51ed8a563507e5d6f6171fdd38]
+
+Signed-off-by: Narpat Mali <narpat.m...@windriver.com>
+---
+ bgpd/bgp_packet.c | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/bgpd/bgp_packet.c b/bgpd/bgp_packet.c
+index 0166dc6a2..2fd28aae3 100644
+--- a/bgpd/bgp_packet.c
++++ b/bgpd/bgp_packet.c
+@@ -1767,7 +1767,7 @@ static int bgp_update_receive(struct peer *peer, 
bgp_size_t size)
+       /* Network Layer Reachability Information. */
+       update_len = end - stream_pnt(s);
+
+-      if (update_len) {
++      if (update_len && attribute_len) {
+               /* Set NLRI portion to structure. */
+               nlris[NLRI_UPDATE].afi = AFI_IP;
+               nlris[NLRI_UPDATE].safi = SAFI_UNICAST;
+--
+2.40.0
diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-protocols/frr/frr_8.2.2.bb 
b/meta-networking/recipes-protocols/frr/frr_8.2.2.bb
index 1897eb2abd..7af584835f 100644
--- a/meta-networking/recipes-protocols/frr/frr_8.2.2.bb
+++ b/meta-networking/recipes-protocols/frr/frr_8.2.2.bb
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ SRC_URI = 
"git://github.com/FRRouting/frr.git;protocol=https;branch=stable/8.2 \
            file://CVE-2022-43681.patch \
            file://CVE-2023-31489.patch \
            file://CVE-2023-31490.patch \
+           file://CVE-2023-38802.patch \
+           file://CVE-2023-41358.patch \
            file://frr.pam \
              "
 
-- 
2.40.0

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#104726): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/104726
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/101168693/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-devel+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to