You sure? Because I remember the test in grpc to check for
CROSS_COMPILING in cmake to avoid that.
Slava
On 10.11.2023 08:12, Samuli Piippo wrote:
This is not strictly a nativesdk issue.
If you enable PACKAGECONFIG = "compiler" for protobuf, it will then
build protoc for the target.
This will then cause grpc target build to fail in the same way as
nativesdk build.
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 at 08:40, Vyacheslav Yurkov <uvv.m...@gmail.com>
wrote:
FTR, I suggested oe-core solution in the corresponding mailing list.
Slava
On 10.11.2023 07:19, Vyacheslav Yurkov via lists.openembedded.org
<http://lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
On 10.11.2023 02:23, Clément Péron wrote:
Hi Samuli,
Le ven. 10 nov. 2023, 00:05, Vyacheslav Yurkov
<uvv.m...@gmail.com> a écrit :
Thanks for the explanation, that was the missing piece for
me to get an understanding of the problem :)
I think it's not only me, but also others, were confused by
the fact that we are talking about native(sdk), but try to
fix something with a non-native variable.
I've just gave it a try and have two suggestions how this
can be addressed.
1. Recipe based solution:
SYSROOT_DIRS:append:class-nativesdk = " $bindir}"
Is it not just missing something like
DEPENDS:append:class-nativesdk= " protobuf-native "
Regards
Clement
This is already implicit by DEPENDS += "protobuf". Take a look at
my second suggestion. You can see that ${bindir} is staged for
native recipes, but not for nativesdk.
2. oe-core based solution:
--- a/meta/classes-global/staging.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes-global/staging.bbclass
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ SYSROOT_DIRS_NATIVE = " \
${localstatedir} \
"
SYSROOT_DIRS:append:class-native = " ${SYSROOT_DIRS_NATIVE}"
+SYSROOT_DIRS:append:class-nativesdk = " ${SYSROOT_DIRS_NATIVE}"
SYSROOT_DIRS:append:class-cross = " ${SYSROOT_DIRS_NATIVE}"
SYSROOT_DIRS:append:class-crosssdk = " ${SYSROOT_DIRS_NATIVE}"
The second one will invalidate nativesdk sstate, but might
cover not only grpc issue (I would assume gdbus-codegen or
any other generator has the same issue when used for SDK build).
What are your thoughs?
Thanks,
Slava
On 09.11.2023 14:35, Samuli Piippo wrote:
DEPENDS += "protobuf" is enough to have dependencies resolved.
Problem is that bitbake's do_populate_sysroot does not take
anything from bindir.
This leads to nativesdk-(qt)grpc's
do_prepare_recipe_sysroot to not get the protoc binary into
the recipe_sysroot as expected by CMake.
This can be fixed with SYSROOT_DIRS.
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 12:19, Vyacheslav Yurkov
<uvv.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Clément,
No, the issue is when you just build nativesdk recipe
(we are not at the stage to use the SDK yet).
And that was exactly my question how to propagate the
dependency correctly for nativesdk build.
Regards,
Slava
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#106528):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/106528
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/101679410/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-devel+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
