Hi Anuj,

I have sent V3 with updated commit message, please let me know if any changes 
are required.

Regards,
Archana
________________________________
From: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org 
<openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org> on behalf of Anuj Mittal via 
lists.openembedded.org <anuj.mittal=intel....@lists.openembedded.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2023 06:51
To: Polampalli, Archana <archana.polampa...@windriver.com>; 
openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org 
<openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [oe][meta-networking][kirkstone][PATCH V2 1/2] samba: fix 
CVE-2023-4091

CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know 
the content is safe.

On Wed, 2023-11-22 at 08:51 +0000, Polampalli, Archana via
lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> From: Archana Polampalli <archana.polampa...@windriver.com>
>
> A vulnerability was discovered in Samba, where the flaw allows SMB
> clients to
> truncate files, even with read-only permissions when the Samba VFS
> module
> "acl_xattr" is configured with "acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes".
> The SMB
> protocol allows opening files when the client requests read-only
> access but
> then implicitly truncates the opened file to 0 bytes if the client
> specifies
> a separate OVERWRITE create disposition request. The issue arises in
> configurations
> that bypass kernel file system permissions checks, relying solely on
> Samba's permissions.
>
> References:
> https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-4091
>
> Signed-off-by: Archana Polampalli <archana.polampa...@windriver.com>
> ---
>  .../samba/samba/CVE-2023-4091-0001.patch      | 193
> ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../samba/samba/CVE-2023-4091-0002.patch      |  59 ++++++
>  .../samba/samba_4.14.14.bb                    |   2 +
>  3 files changed, 254 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 meta-networking/recipes-
> connectivity/samba/samba/CVE-2023-4091-0001.patch
>  create mode 100644 meta-networking/recipes-
> connectivity/samba/samba/CVE-2023-4091-0002.patch
>
> diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/samba/samba/CVE-
> 2023-4091-0001.patch b/meta-networking/recipes-
> connectivity/samba/samba/CVE-2023-4091-0001.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..908ab85ba
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/samba/samba/CVE-2023-4091-
> 0001.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
> +From b08a60160e6ab8d982d31844bcbf7ab67ff3a8de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> 2001
> +From: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
> +Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 12:30:00 +0200
> +Subject: [PATCH 2/2] CVE-2023-4091: smbtorture: test overwrite
> dispositions on
> + read-only file
> +
> +BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15439
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
> +
> +CVE: CVE-2023-4091
> +
> +Upstream-Status: Backport
> [https://github.com/samba-team/samba/commit/b08a60160e6ab8d982d31844b
> cbf7ab67ff3a8de]
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Archana Polampalli <archana.polampa...@windriver.com>
> +---
> + selftest/knownfail.d/samba3.smb2.acls |   1 +
> + source4/torture/smb2/acls.c           | 145
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> + 2 files changed, 146 insertions(+)
> + create mode 100644 selftest/knownfail.d/samba3.smb2.acls
> +
> +diff --git a/selftest/knownfail.d/samba3.smb2.acls
> b/selftest/knownfail.d/samba3.smb2.acls
> +new file mode 100644
> +index 0000000..18df260
> +--- /dev/null
> ++++ b/selftest/knownfail.d/samba3.smb2.acls
> +@@ -0,0 +1 @@
> ++^samba3.smb2.acls.OVERWRITE_READ_ONLY_FILE
> +diff --git a/source4/torture/smb2/acls.c
> b/source4/torture/smb2/acls.c
> +index 4f4538b..d26caeb 100644
> +--- a/source4/torture/smb2/acls.c
> ++++ b/source4/torture/smb2/acls.c
> +@@ -3023,6 +3023,149 @@ done:
> +       return ret;
> + }
> +
> ++static bool test_overwrite_read_only_file(struct torture_context
> *tctx,
> ++                                        struct smb2_tree *tree)
> ++{
> ++      NTSTATUS status;
> ++      struct smb2_create c;
> ++      const char *fname = BASEDIR
> "\\test_overwrite_read_only_file.txt<file://\\test_overwrite_read_only_file.txt>";
> ++      struct smb2_handle handle = {{0}};
> ++      union smb_fileinfo q;
> ++      union smb_setfileinfo set;
> ++      struct security_descriptor *sd = NULL, *sd_orig = NULL;
> ++      const char *owner_sid = NULL;
> ++      int i;
> ++      bool ret = true;
> ++
> ++      struct tcase {
> ++              int disposition;
> ++              const char *disposition_string;
> ++              NTSTATUS expected_status;
> ++      } tcases[] = {
> ++#define TCASE(d, s) {                         \
> ++              .disposition = d,               \
> ++              .disposition_string = #d,       \
> ++              .expected_status = s,           \
> ++      }
> ++              TCASE(NTCREATEX_DISP_OPEN, NT_STATUS_OK),
> ++              TCASE(NTCREATEX_DISP_SUPERSEDE,
> NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED),
> ++              TCASE(NTCREATEX_DISP_OVERWRITE,
> NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED),
> ++              TCASE(NTCREATEX_DISP_OVERWRITE_IF,
> NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED),
> ++      };
> ++#undef TCASE
> ++
> ++      ret = smb2_util_setup_dir(tctx, tree, BASEDIR);
> ++      torture_assert_goto(tctx, ret, ret, done,
> "smb2_util_setup_dir not ok");
> ++
> ++      c = (struct smb2_create) {
> ++              .in.desired_access = SEC_STD_READ_CONTROL |
> ++                      SEC_STD_WRITE_DAC |
> ++                      SEC_STD_WRITE_OWNER,
> ++              .in.file_attributes = FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL,
> ++              .in.share_access = NTCREATEX_SHARE_ACCESS_READ |
> ++                      NTCREATEX_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE,
> ++              .in.create_disposition = NTCREATEX_DISP_OPEN_IF,
> ++              .in.impersonation_level =
> NTCREATEX_IMPERSONATION_ANONYMOUS,
> ++              .in.fname = fname,
> ++      };
> ++
> ++      status = smb2_create(tree, tctx, &c);
> ++      torture_assert_ntstatus_ok_goto(tctx, status, ret, done,
> ++                                      "smb2_create failed\n");
> ++      handle = c.out.file.handle;
> ++
> ++      torture_comment(tctx, "get the original sd\n");
> ++
> ++      ZERO_STRUCT(q);
> ++      q.query_secdesc.level = RAW_FILEINFO_SEC_DESC;
> ++      q.query_secdesc.in.file.handle = handle;
> ++      q.query_secdesc.in.secinfo_flags = SECINFO_DACL |
> SECINFO_OWNER;
> ++
> ++      status = smb2_getinfo_file(tree, tctx, &q);
> ++      torture_assert_ntstatus_ok_goto(tctx, status, ret, done,
> ++                                      "smb2_getinfo_file
> failed\n");
> ++      sd_orig = q.query_secdesc.out.sd;
> ++
> ++      owner_sid = dom_sid_string(tctx, sd_orig->owner_sid);
> ++
> ++      sd = security_descriptor_dacl_create(tctx,
> ++                                      0, NULL, NULL,
> ++                                      owner_sid,
> ++                                      SEC_ACE_TYPE_ACCESS_ALLOWED,
> ++                                      SEC_FILE_READ_DATA,
> ++                                      0,
> ++                                      NULL);
> ++
> ++      ZERO_STRUCT(set);
> ++      set.set_secdesc.level = RAW_SFILEINFO_SEC_DESC;
> ++      set.set_secdesc.in.file.handle = handle;
> ++      set.set_secdesc.in.secinfo_flags = SECINFO_DACL;
> ++      set.set_secdesc.in.sd = sd;
> ++
> ++      status = smb2_setinfo_file(tree, &set);
> ++      torture_assert_ntstatus_ok_goto(tctx, status, ret, done,
> ++                                      "smb2_setinfo_file
> failed\n");
> ++
> ++      smb2_util_close(tree, handle);
> ++      ZERO_STRUCT(handle);
> ++
> ++      for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tcases); i++) {
> ++              torture_comment(tctx, "Verify open with %s
> dispostion\n",
> ++                              tcases[i].disposition_string);
> ++
> ++              c = (struct smb2_create) {
> ++                      .in.create_disposition =
> tcases[i].disposition,
> ++                      .in.desired_access = SEC_FILE_READ_DATA,
> ++                      .in.file_attributes = FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL,
> ++                      .in.share_access =
> NTCREATEX_SHARE_ACCESS_MASK,
> ++                      .in.impersonation_level =
> NTCREATEX_IMPERSONATION_ANONYMOUS,
> ++                      .in.fname = fname,
> ++              };
> ++
> ++              status = smb2_create(tree, tctx, &c);
> ++              smb2_util_close(tree, c.out.file.handle);
> ++              torture_assert_ntstatus_equal_goto(
> ++                      tctx, status, tcases[i].expected_status, ret,
> done,
> ++                      "smb2_create failed\n");
> ++      };
> ++
> ++      torture_comment(tctx, "put back original sd\n");
> ++
> ++      c = (struct smb2_create) {
> ++              .in.desired_access = SEC_STD_WRITE_DAC,
> ++              .in.file_attributes = FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL,
> ++              .in.share_access = NTCREATEX_SHARE_ACCESS_MASK,
> ++              .in.create_disposition = NTCREATEX_DISP_OPEN_IF,
> ++              .in.impersonation_level =
> NTCREATEX_IMPERSONATION_ANONYMOUS,
> ++              .in.fname = fname,
> ++      };
> ++
> ++      status = smb2_create(tree, tctx, &c);
> ++      torture_assert_ntstatus_ok_goto(tctx, status, ret, done,
> ++                                      "smb2_create failed\n");
> ++      handle = c.out.file.handle;
> ++
> ++      ZERO_STRUCT(set);
> ++      set.set_secdesc.level = RAW_SFILEINFO_SEC_DESC;
> ++      set.set_secdesc.in.file.handle = handle;
> ++      set.set_secdesc.in.secinfo_flags = SECINFO_DACL;
> ++      set.set_secdesc.in.sd = sd_orig;
> ++
> ++      status = smb2_setinfo_file(tree, &set);
> ++      torture_assert_ntstatus_ok_goto(tctx, status, ret, done,
> ++                                      "smb2_setinfo_file
> failed\n");
> ++
> ++      smb2_util_close(tree, handle);
> ++      ZERO_STRUCT(handle);
> ++
> ++done:
> ++      smb2_util_close(tree, handle);
> ++      smb2_util_unlink(tree, fname);
> ++      smb2_deltree(tree, BASEDIR);
> ++      return ret;
> ++}
> ++
> ++
> + /*
> +    basic testing of SMB2 ACLs
> + */
> +@@ -3051,6 +3194,8 @@ struct torture_suite
> *torture_smb2_acls_init(TALLOC_CTX *ctx)
> +                       test_deny1);
> +       torture_suite_add_1smb2_test(suite, "MXAC-NOT-GRANTED",
> +                       test_mxac_not_granted);
> ++      torture_suite_add_1smb2_test(suite,
> "OVERWRITE_READ_ONLY_FILE",
> ++                      test_overwrite_read_only_file);
> +
> +       suite->description = talloc_strdup(suite, "SMB2-ACLS tests");
> +
> +--
> +2.40.0
> diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/samba/samba/CVE-
> 2023-4091-0002.patch b/meta-networking/recipes-
> connectivity/samba/samba/CVE-2023-4091-0002.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..43d3b4929
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/samba/samba/CVE-2023-4091-
> 0002.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
> +From 8b26f634372f11edcbea33dfd68a3d57889dfcc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> 2001
> +From: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
> +Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 13:04:36 +0200
> +Subject: [PATCH] CVE-2023-4091: smbd: use open_access_mask for
> access check in
> +    open_file()
> +
> +If the client requested FILE_OVERWRITE[_IF], we're implicitly adding
> +FILE_WRITE_DATA to the open_access_mask in open_file_ntcreate(), but
> for the
> +access check we're using access_mask which doesn't contain the
> additional
> +right, which means we can end up truncating a file for which the
> user has
> +only read-only access via an SD.
> +
> +BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15439
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <s...@samba.org>
> +
> +CVE: CVE-2023-4091
> +
> +Upstream-Status: Backport
> [https://github.com/samba-team/samba/commit/8b26f634372f11edcbea33dfd
> 68a3d57889dfcc5]
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Archana Polampalli <archana.polampa...@windriver.com>
> +---
> + selftest/knownfail.d/samba3.smb2.acls | 1 -
> + source3/smbd/open.c                   | 4 ++--
> + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> + delete mode 100644 selftest/knownfail.d/samba3.smb2.acls
> +
> +diff --git a/selftest/knownfail.d/samba3.smb2.acls
> b/selftest/knownfail.d/samba3.smb2.acls
> +deleted file mode 100644
> +index 18df260..0000000
> +--- a/selftest/knownfail.d/samba3.smb2.acls
> ++++ /dev/null
> +@@ -1 +0,0 @@
> +-^samba3.smb2.acls.OVERWRITE_READ_ONLY_FILE
> +diff --git a/source3/smbd/open.c b/source3/smbd/open.c
> +index 2c3bf9e..4bec5cb 100644
> +--- a/source3/smbd/open.c
> ++++ b/source3/smbd/open.c
> +@@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ static NTSTATUS open_file(files_struct *fsp,
> +                                               conn->cwd_fsp,
> +                                               smb_fname,
> +                                               false,
> +-                                              access_mask);
> ++                                              open_access_mask);

What I was trying to say in last comment is that you are patching the
function call to smbd_check_access_rights here while the commit you are
referencing patches smbd_check_access_rights_fsp. Have you checked to
make sure that the changes are still correct/relevant?

Since this is not a clean backport, please mention in the commit
message that this change was done.

Thanks,

Anuj

> +
> +                               if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) {
> +                                       DEBUG(10, ("open_file: "
> +@@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ static NTSTATUS open_file(files_struct *fsp,
> +                               conn->cwd_fsp,
> +                               smb_fname,
> +                               false,
> +-                              access_mask);
> ++                              open_access_mask);
> +
> +               if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status,
> NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND) &&
> +                               (fsp->posix_flags &
> FSP_POSIX_FLAGS_OPEN) &&
> +--
> +2.40.0
> +
> diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-
> connectivity/samba/samba_4.14.14.bb b/meta-networking/recipes-
> connectivity/samba/samba_4.14.14.bb
> index aa27592cb..dcb4d8137 100644
> --- a/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/samba/samba_4.14.14.bb
> +++ b/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/samba/samba_4.14.14.bb
> @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ SRC_URI = "${SAMBA_MIRROR}/stable/samba-
> ${PV}.tar.gz \
>             file://CVE-2023-34968_0009.patch \
>             file://CVE-2023-34968_0010.patch \
>             file://CVE-2023-34968_0011.patch \
> +           file://CVE-2023-4091-0001.patch \
> +           file://CVE-2023-4091-0002.patch \
>             "
>
>  SRC_URI:append:libc-musl = " \
>
>
>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#107021): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/107021
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/102745790/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-devel+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to