On 3/5/24 15:42, Martin Jansa wrote:
Invalid format of Upstream-Status and please squash those 2 commits as
they don't make sense separately.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 10:26 PM Randolph Sapp via
lists.openembedded.org <rs=ti....@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
From: Randolph Sapp <r...@ti.com>
Backport a patch from the upstream glmark2 package to fix 2 primary issues:
1. Configs with stencil components were ranked unnecessarily low.
2. If the target config was below 0 an optimal config may not be properly
selected.
Randolph Sapp (2):
glmark2: add upstream patch to not care about stencil config
glmark2: add the stencil config patch to the package
...y-default-don-t-care-about-the-stenc.patch | 103 ++++++++++++++++++
.../recipes-benchmark/glmark2/glmark2_git.bb | 1 +
2 files changed, 104 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/glmark2/files/0003-GLVisualConfig-By-default-don-t-care-about-the-stenc.patch
--
2.44.0
Roger. Would the correct status be:
> Upstream-Status: Backport [5f23d540342ba69e12afeb6a1ac4f6fd36747975]
(Reading the docs I was not aware the brackets were supposed to be
included...)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#109136):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/109136
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/104754322/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-devel+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
