On 05/30/2008 02:08 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:32:07AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:45:52AM +0200, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
Hello Tom,
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The following patch (also attached to the bug) enforces this by taking
out the removal of the glibc version of these headers and adds a
mechanism to ensure that the versions of linux-libc-headers which do use
the headers_install mechanism but are older than 2.6.24 will not package
these up.
I do not see this mechanism? Could you explain how this is ensured?
Er, you almost quoted it below:
[snip]
I can't read patches that well, just make sure there is a newline in
the resulting file.
Note that currently there's no newline at end of file (just quilt pop'd
my stack and opened the file up, vim says noeol). The patch to this part
of the file adds the EOL, after the do_install_append().
I have taken this as 2 ACKs and updated the bug, linking to the two
posts in qustion ACKing this. However, I haven't seen this be committed
yet. Thanks!
Tom,
Has this been applied yet? If not, please reply with mtn diff to the
list and I will commit.
Thanks
Gordon
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-stablebranch mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-stablebranch
