Hi Fil, You are right! But thats the official website of Open ERP India. Its a direct link to their website.
So if there is a trojan, its on their site. I have copied this mail to the right people who can correct that. Cheers! On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:00 AM, office <off...@filsystem.ro> wrote: > If what you say is true, then you're right to be angry. But, please be > careful with links in email or forums because your link > http://blog.openerp.co.in/?p=400 from your mail is infected with JS / > Agent Trojan NCA. > Thanks, > Dumitru Gilcescu > Fil System > > *From:* Sharoon Thomas <sharoontho...@teagarden.in> > *Sent:* Saturday, May 15, 2010 2:54 AM > *To:* Fabien Pinckaers <f...@tinyerp.com> > *Cc:* Openerp Expert Framework<openerp-expert-framew...@lists.launchpad.net>; > Stephane > Wirtel <s...@tinyerp.com> ; openerp-commun...@lists.launchpad.net ; Varun > Kumar <varun.ku...@openlabs.co.in> ; > openerp-community-leaders@lists.launchpad.net > *Subject:* [Openerp-community] Injustice,plagiarism and insult of > community work > > Hello Fabien and the Open ERP community, > > I request your attention to this post dated 2nd of May: > http://blog.openerp.co.in/?p=400 > > It is a clear duplication of work done by Open ERP SA on the community > module 'Powerwmail' . > > I am not surprised but shocked to see this trend repeating again and again. > Why is it that the community ideas have to reinvented by Open ERP SA in a > different name everytime? It happened with scenario, rml and now I think it > is right time to question whether its the right ethics for an opensource > project ? To retain the copyright on the Open ERP code Open ERP SA goes to > any extend? > > I understand that it is Open ERP business model that 800EUR (or may be more > because of the heavy code) is what is needed for a module to be 'certified'. > Is it because the community cannot pay for a community contribution that the > effort is duplicated? Well I think contribution of such useful features > itself makes openerp more that worth 800EUR because till today I have > received numerous mails saying how the work saves every developer couple of > days. This is strongly disappointing for any community contributor. What is > the point in releasing the code if it is next day going to be duplicated by > your paid employees? What is the point of the community if the credits are > all for open ERP SA? > > I draw the attention also to the commitment made by fabien and antoine at > the community days in Belgium to all those present there that poweremail > would be drawn into official 6.0. I request you to respect the community and > your own words. > > Have a look at the duplicated work: > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~openerp-commiter/openobject-addons/trunk-mod3-local/annotate/head:/fetchmail/fetchmail.py<http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Eopenerp-commiter/openobject-addons/trunk-mod3-local/annotate/head:/fetchmail/fetchmail.py> > The model structure is 90% similar. Logic is 99% similar. > > I wonder why you could not contribute if there is anything that's not there > to the main poweremail code which is open to everybody to edit. ( > https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-commiter/poweremail/poweremailtrunk<https://code.launchpad.net/%7Eopenerp-commiter/poweremail/poweremailtrunk> > ) > > I wish you spend your resources and time on playing the fair editor of an > opensource project. Not Micro$oft of the opensource world. I may not waste > my time on fighting legally or morally for the sake of poweremail again, but > be sure that community members will also soon realise that contributing to > openerp is waste of time. Who knows if their work will be duplicated by the > editor in the next release. You discourage contribution to openerp and I > speculate the intention of open ERP SA in holding the copyright of the code > whatever they need integrated into the core. > > When I conclude this mail, I am not sure if I will ever get a reply for > this mail from 'Open ERP SA'. But please remember that the more you do this, > the more the community moves away from you. > > Wish you good luck plagiarising! > > and a simple advice to your Indian team doing all the duplication work: > Atleast show the quality of code poweremail has in your duplicated work. I > can already see several logical foolishnes in your code and absolute '0' in > code quality. Atleast try making something better with all the TODO's that > has been left in the code. > > Thanks, > -- > Sharoon Thomas > Business Analyst & Open Source ERP Consultant > CEO @ http://openlabs.co.in > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: > https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community<https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenerp-community> > Post to : openerp-commun...@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community<https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenerp-community> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 5115 (20100514) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 5115 (20100514) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > -- Sharoon Thomas Business Analyst & Open Source ERP Consultant CEO @ http://openlabs.co.in
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community-leaders Post to : openerp-community-leaders@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community-leaders More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
