Removing from ocb-addons as there is no merge proposal.
** No longer affects: ocb-addons ** No longer affects: ocb-addons/7.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenERP Community Backports Team, which is subscribed to OpenERP Community Backports (Addons). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996816 Title: using _inherit and _name for a class is not modular Status in OpenERP Server: Confirmed Bug description: If you define a class that use _inherit and _name, to make a copy of the parent class, you expect that any modification made by a tier module is applied to both the parent and the copy classes. But it's not the case and here are the steps to help you to figure it out: 1°) My aim is to use a copy of the stock.picking class for incoming shipments, it will allow me to simplify the code a lot (especially in the views definition). So i defined a class stock.picking.in as follow (stock/stock.py): class stock_picking_in(osv.osv): _inherit= 'stock.picking' _name='stock.picking.in' _table='stock_picking' #(here the copy model is using the same table as the parent, but it's not relevant for the bug description, and the same apply if the table is different) ... 2°) in purchase module, i changed the one2many field on the purchase order that referred to the stock_picking table. What i need to do is to reference the class stock.picking.in, instead of the stock.picking. So i defined it as follow (purchase/purchase.py, line 176): 'picking_ids': fields.one2many('stock.picking.in', 'purchase_id', 'Picking List', readonly=True, help="This is the list of incoming shipments that have been generated for this purchase order."), 3°) the purchase module already include some code to add the field purchase_id on the stock.picking class and table (purchase/stock.py): 37 class stock_picking(osv.osv): 38 _inherit = 'stock.picking' 39 _columns = { 40 'purchase_id': fields.many2one('purchase.order', 'Purchase Order', 41 ondelete='set null', select=True), 42 } So i thought it would be ok like this... But, no it isn't. At the purchase module installation a traceback is telling me that the field purchase_id doesn't exists on the stock.picking.in model. The addition of it on stock.picking didn't propagate to my class. This is really problematic because it means that using _inherit and _name on the same class is not modular. *Note that, in the meanwhile this bug is solved (if it will be) i this used a workaround: i just copied the add of the purchase_id field on my new stock.picking.in class too, in this way (purchase/stock.py): 129 # Redefinition of the new field in order to update the model stock.picking.in in the orm 132 class stock_picking_in(osv.osv): 133 _inherit = 'stock.picking.in' 134 _columns = { 135 'purchase_id': fields.many2one('purchase.order', 'Purchase Order', 136 ondelete='set null', select=True), 137 } So yeah, it works but it's not convenient. If we want to use more and more this feature we should improve its modularity. Please be kind and remove this hack[*] whenever the framework support this feature. Thanks, Quentin [*]: the same applies for the sale module, of course. Lines to remove when it's fixed are in sale/stock.py 189 # Redefinition of the new field in order to update the model stock.picking.out in the orm 192 class stock_picking_out(osv.osv): 193 _inherit = 'stock.picking.out' 194 _columns = { 195 'sale_id': fields.many2one('sale.order', 'Sale Order', 196 ondelete='set null', select=True), 197 } To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openobject-server/+bug/996816/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community-reviewer Post to : openerp-community-reviewer@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community-reviewer More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
