2014-05-20 17:25 GMT-05:00 Ian Beardslee <[email protected]>: > Open Source is not about the licence fees, you go down the proprietary > path for that. We want to provide a solution that is free from the > proprietary fees that limits the number of people or the way that they can > use the software. >
Well. This statement is not true. Our main complain is not the fact of have a fee user/based is more a fact of have a public unpayable fee. We need to be care abour our statements, when we sell our services over a platform done by others is "easy" confuse it. Your definition is the definition of "FreeWare" or "Free Software" We are talking here about "Access to the code" which IS a customer value. I can't imagine that we'd be overly keen on going with that new > partnership/costing model, thankfully as it is open source we can still > use it for ourselves and clients, make changes and contribute those > changes back to the community. > Well this is the no lock-in part but is difficult get a software and a brand that cost 20 millions build and use freely this statements. IMHO customers deserve a good product with a good service, what WE complain is that the new public price is un-payable which have a total different means "Free of charge per user". Regards. -- -------------------- Saludos Cordiales Nhomar G. Hernandez M. +58-414-4110269 Skype: nhomar00 Web-Blog: http://geronimo.com.ve Servicios IT: http://vauxoo.com Linux-Counter: 467724 Correos: [email protected] [email protected] twitter @nhomar
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
