Hello. On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 19:13, Antonio Ospite wrote: > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:42:40 +0100 > Stefan Schmidt <ste...@datenfreihafen.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 18:19, Antonio Ospite wrote: > > > NOTE: this version builds fine but the resulting binaries do not seem to > > > be correct, their size is about 300KiB instead of the expected 64KiB. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <osp...@studenti.unina.it> > > > > I would need some more information before acking this one. Does the old rev > > still build with the gcc in OE? > > > > If yes I would prefer to stay with the old rev as a known working one until > > the > > root cause is found and fixed. If it does not even build we could go ahead > > and > > bump the rev as it does make things not even worse. > > > > The current version doesn't even build, so bumping the revision is good > even if doesn't solve the size issue. > > > Side note for others: Personally I know nobody who ever installed the > > gen-blob > > produced with OE on his phone. All people who did it used a precompiled > > version > > from Wyrm, Antonio or me or compiled it by hand. So this one should not > > bring to > > much harm. > > > > As you may guess, even compiling it manually "doesn't work" anymore with > a recent toolchain... to be more precise: I've tried running the > big binary loading it via usb, it seems to work but it is just not > suitable to be flashed because of its size.
Interesting. It is stripped, right? Anyway, as the old one does not build and the new one "works" you have my Acked-by: Stefan Schmidt <ste...@datenfreihafen.org> regards Stefan Schmidt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature