On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 11:56:31AM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:46:38 +0100 > Antonio Ospite <osp...@studenti.unina.it> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > this patchset has the purpose of adding support for the regulator framework > > to > > the mmc_spi driver. The first three patches are preparatory cleanups to > > make > > the fourth one more straightforward. > > > > Maybe the fourth patch can be improved, I am open to any suggestions about > > it. > > > > Ping. I forgot to Cc spi-devel-general on this series, should I resend > it?
Not a bad idea. It doesn't go via my tree since it is an mmc patch, not an spi one, but I don't mind taking a look at the spi bits. g. > > > These changes take strong inspiration from the pxamci driver; they have > > been > > tested on a Motorola A910, which uses a regulator to powerup the MMC card > > connected to the SPI bus, a test from a current user of the mmc_spi driver > > would not hurt just to be sure no regressions have been introduced. > > > > Thanks, > > Antonio > > > > Antonio Ospite (4): > > mmc_spi.c: factor out the check for power capability > > mmc_spi.c: factor out the SD card shutdown sequence > > mmc_spi.c: factor out a mmc_spi_setpower() function > > mmc_spi.c: add support for the regulator framework > > > > drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c | 194 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > > 1 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) > > > > -- > Antonio Ospite > http://ao2.it > > PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001 > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
