Errol,

After mulling over your comments and doing some checking in the HA openfiler 
forum and elsewhere, I am now convinced that your suggestions are the way to go 
me - at least for now.

Thanks again for your valuable input.

Kevin.

--- Original Message ---
> Send Openfiler-users mailing list submissions to
>       [email protected]
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       https://lists.openfiler.com/mailman/listinfo/openfiler-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
> specific
> than "Re: Contents of Openfiler-users digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Openfiler-users Digest, Vol 45, Issue 4
>       ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>    2. Re: Re: Openfiler-users Digest, Vol 45, Issue 4 (Errol
> Neal)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:02:15 -0600 (CST)
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [OF-users] Re: Openfiler-users Digest, Vol 45, Issue
> 4
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID:
>       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
> 
> 
> Thanks for your Help.  I had not known about DRDB.  It looks
> like it could be a solution for me.
> Originally, I was thinking of having two OF nodes and 2 D-Link
> storage devices (which use Ethernet connections) that would
> provide HA and load balancing.  I could be wrong, but it looks
> like DRBD cannot provide the load balancing - which I may just
> live without for now.
> 
> The question still remains:  will OF recognize the ethernet
> based D-Link storage device?  In the long run this may be an
> cheaper solution, since it seems to me that I will need to,
> using DRDB,  replicate my hard drive space on the other OF
> box.
> 
> Again, thanks for all of your help.
> 
> 
> --- Original Message ---
> > Send Openfiler-users mailing list submissions to
> >     [email protected]
> > 
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >     https://lists.openfiler.com/mailman/listinfo/openfiler-users
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
> > specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Openfiler-users digest..."
> > 
> > 
> > Today's Topics:
> > 
> >    1. Need help with Network Storage devices and Openfiler
> >       (Kevin Waters)
> >    2. Re: Need help with Network Storage devices and        Openfiler
> >       (Errol Neal)
> > 
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 16:27:35 -0600 (CST)
> > From: Kevin Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: [OF-users] Need help with Network Storage devices
> > and
> >     Openfiler
> > To: [email protected]
> > Message-ID:
> >     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> > 
> > All,
> > ?
> > I am looking to upgrading my current one node openfiler server
> > into an HA server with at least two nodes.? Currently, however,
> > all of my storage is connected to the server via USB, SATA or
> > IDE.? So I am assuming that I will need a Network Storage
> > device where both nodes can access simultaneously.
> > ?
> > I am contemplating purchasing a D-Link (DNS-323) 2-Bay Hard
> > drive enclosure to start with and am curious if anyone has any
> > thought/experience on the matter.? Such as, will the openfiler
> > software recognize this device on the network as a storage
> > device.? Or, are there any recommendations on another brand
> > of Storage device?
> > ?
> > Any help would be appreciated.
> > ?
> > Thanks
> > Kevin.
> > 
> > 
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: 
> > https://lists.openfiler.com/pipermail/openfiler-users/attachments/20071109/70b834a1/attachment-0001.html
> > 
> > ------------------------------
> > 
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Fri,  9 Nov 2007 21:10:42 -0500
> > From: Errol Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [OF-users] Need help with Network Storage devices
> > and
> >     Openfiler
> > To: [email protected]
> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> > 
> > Quoting Kevin Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 
> > > All,
> > >  I am looking to upgrading my current one node openfiler server into  
> > >  an HA server with at least two nodes.  Currently, however, all of  
> > > my  storage is connected to the server via USB, SATA or IDE.  So I  
> > > am  assuming that I will need a Network Storage device where both  
> > > nodes  can access simultaneously.
> > 
> > Isn't DRBD included in openfiler? If so, your storage can exist
> > as it  
> > does currently.
> > 
> > [see the thread below]
> > https://lists.openfiler.com/pipermail/openfiler-users/2005-April/004434.html
> > 
> > 
> > > I am contemplating purchasing a D-Link (DNS-323) 2-Bay Hard drive   
> > > enclosure to start with and am curious if anyone has any   
> > > thought/experience on the matter.  Such as, will the openfiler   
> > > software recognize this device on the network as a storage device.    
> > > Or, are there any recommendations on another brand of Storage device?
> > 
> > First of all, I don't think you want to try to address a single
> > point  
> > of failure by introducing one. Secondly, your storage technology
> > needs  
> > to support clustering/high availability. USB does not support
> > this.
> > I'd focus my efforts on DRBD + Openfiler + HA
> > 
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> > 
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > Name: not available
> > Type: application/pgp-keys
> > Size: 1328 bytes
> > Desc: PGP Public Key
> > Url : 
> > https://lists.openfiler.com/pipermail/openfiler-users/attachments/20071109/1d6e0d80/attachment-0001.bin
> > 
> > ------------------------------
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openfiler-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.openfiler.com/mailman/listinfo/openfiler-users
> > 
> > 
> > End of Openfiler-users Digest, Vol 45, Issue 4
> > **********************************************
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:23:16 -0500
> From: Errol Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [OF-users] Re: Openfiler-users Digest, Vol 45,
> Issue 4
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> 
> >
> > Thanks for your Help.  I had not known about DRDB.  It looks like it  
> >  could be a solution for me.
> > Originally, I was thinking of having two OF nodes and 2 D-Link   
> > storage devices (which use Ethernet connections) that would provide   
> > HA and load balancing.  I could be wrong, but it looks like DRBD   
> > cannot provide the load balancing - which I may just live without   
> > for now.
> 
> DRBD doesn't even provide total HA really. Other add ons like
>  
> Heartbeat can work on a DRBD system to provide the missing
> pieces.
> As far as the load balancing goes, I don't think you can achieve
> true  
> load balancing on a storage system. Unless you were using
> something  
> like DFS which isn't really true load balancing anyways.
> 
> 
> > The question still remains:  will OF recognize the ethernet based   
> > D-Link storage device?  In the long run this may be an cheaper   
> > solution, since it seems to me that I will need to, using DRDB,    
> > replicate my hard drive space on the other OF box.
> 
> Why use this device at all? If DRBD is replicating your storage
> to  
> another system, why not save money and use an internal sata
> hd?
> 
> > Again, thanks for all of your help.
> >
> 
> NO problem.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-keys
> Size: 1328 bytes
> Desc: PGP Public Key
> Url : 
> https://lists.openfiler.com/pipermail/openfiler-users/attachments/20071112/cc9991db/attachment-0001.bin
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openfiler-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openfiler.com/mailman/listinfo/openfiler-users
> 
> 
> End of Openfiler-users Digest, Vol 45, Issue 5
> **********************************************

_______________________________________________
Openfiler-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openfiler.com/mailman/listinfo/openfiler-users

Reply via email to