Hi, One more thing that is a bit ambigouos, which I'd like to get clarified (or at least hear other people's opinion about it).
If I have the following scenario: - A flow in table 0 matches the incoming packet - puts an output-action on port 0 to the action set - sends the packet to table 1 - In table 1 there is no matching entry - the table default config is to send a packet_in At this point, should the switch send the packet out on port 0 (based on flow 0), or send a packet_in (because of the table config)? I think both are valid, and make sense. The spec. (bottom of pg. 6.) seems to suggest the latter, but there is a direct test-case for the former [1]. So the question is: which is the expected behavior; and if the answer is "either", should we add a new table config, like OFPTC_TABLE_MISS_EXECUTE, to make explicit distinction between the two possible? Regards, Zoltan. [1] http://yuba.stanford.edu/git/gitweb.cgi?p=oftest.git;a=blob;f=tests/multi-table.py;h=7616cdff3435e2d8efbb5427b1f11bbcf459af53;hb=oft-1.1#l37
_______________________________________________ openflow-discuss mailing list openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
