BL> It seems that you should be able to simply specify L3 or L4 match
BL> fields via the NOX API, as Ramon is doing, and have everything both
BL> work on the switch *and* be reported correctly via dpctl, but that
BL> doesn't seem to be the case at this time.
NB> I don't see how you could deterministically provide this "magic".
NB>
NB> - Lets say someone specifies nw_src - did they want the dl_type to be
NB> 0x800 or 0x806? nw_src is a valid field for both ethertypes.
If they don't specify dl_type, they presumably want both (and any other
ethertype too), just like if they leave any other field blank.
NB> - How about tp_src and tp_dst? What ip_proto should we assume that you
NB> are using?
Does it need to assume that you're using any ip_proto?
-Josh (j...@bbn.com)
_______________________________________________
openflow-discuss mailing list
openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
