SAS> And I strongly believe that standard I/O is one of the most important SAS> metrics for a controller as it really enables you to decide what SAS> controller one should use in a real time environment so that one can SAS> be sure of the stability of the openflow network.
It really depends on what you're trying to do. If you're trying to test out a bunch of complicated new algorithms, just to see if they work at all, and don't care about scalability, you care much more about ease of development than about run-time performance (as long as performance is above a reasonable minimum). SAS> As we are currently trying to evaluate different controllers I would SAS> really like some feedback from you guys like what other metrics can SAS> we introduce in our experiments to make the comparison as SAS> comprehensive as possible. I think the idea of having a bunch of different metrics is a very good one, so that people can focus on the metrics that they care about for their particular situation. One other general question: Will you be able to repeat your testing as controllers come and go (and change)? -- Josh Smift <j...@bbn.com> GENI Project Office Senior Systems Engineer BBN Technologies, Cambridge MA US _______________________________________________ openflow-discuss mailing list openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
