Using the wireless access point is the same scenario as a wired learning
switch. In this case, you can think of your wireless access point as a two
port switch (bridging the interfaces). Your controller will just learn
multiple clients on the same in_port. Nox's pyswitch shouldn't need to be
modified in order to do L2 switching now that you're using wireless.

Aaron

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:23 PM, shreya pandita <shreya.pand...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hey ,
>
> I was just wondering , what should be my controller functionality be for
> openflow in wireless like -- for eg nox controller module "pyswitch" makes
> the switch behave like a learning switch .
> Mac addresses are associated with the port numbers entries . If the
> destination mac entry is already there in the flow table , it would output
> to the respective port number , else it would flood except for the input
> port.
>
> Now that the switch is an wireless acess point . How should my controller
> behaviour be like .?
> I am confused . Any suggestions down this line ..so that I can write a
> small NOX controller API for wireless .
>
> Now that I have this tp link router with me and I would point it to a
> controller <may be a nox api ,which I would have to write >
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Andrew Ferguson <a...@cs.brown.edu> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 7, 2012, at 1:47 PM, shreya pandita wrote:
>>
>> Jan 01 04:44:18|00009|rconn|INFO|tcp:10.0.0.5:6633: connected
>> Jan 01 04:44:48|00010|rconn|ERR|tcp:10.0.0.5:6633: no response to
>> inactivity probe after 15 seconds, disconnecting
>> Jan 01 04:44:48|00011|rconn|INFO|tcp:10.0.0.5:6633: connection dropped
>> Jan 01 04:44:49|00012|rconn|INFO|tcp:10.0.0.5:6633: connecting...
>>
>>
>> The controller and the openwrt switch are connected , for sometime and
>> then they lose connection . Is this a normal behaviour ??. Is there any
>> file or something where I can increase the inactivity period.
>>
>>
>> Hi Shreya,
>>
>> I have seen this behavior as well. It's not a serious problem for two
>> reasons 1) it immediately re-connects after dropping the connection due to
>> inactivity, and 2) if you have any OF messages being exchanged between the
>> switch and the controller, these heartbeat messages won't be responsible
>> for keeping the connection alive, and you won't see the
>> disconnect/reconnect cycle.
>>
>> I've looked into why this is happening and it seems to be some sort of
>> timing issue. The switch receives the OF ECHO_REPLY message from the
>> controller, but doesn't process it. However, if you add the option
>> "--verbose=vconn:file:dbg" to ofprotocol, then it *does* process the
>> ECHO_REPLY message. That seems to be enough to cause the packet to be
>> processed.
>>
>> I recently tried re-compiling the kernel for the TP-LINK to use 1000 Hz
>> timers instead of the default 100 Hz, but that causes the ethernet drivers
>> not to load, and you'll need to re-flash the firmware with a serial cable.
>> :-)   I'm going to try 250 Hz timers when I get a chance, but I'm still
>> speculating on the root cause.
>>
>> Happy to share more details with you off list.
>>
>> cheers,
>> Andrew
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openflow-discuss mailing list
> openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
openflow-discuss mailing list
openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss

Reply via email to