I'm confused.  You say the controller isn't taking action, but also that you're 
running l2_learning (which takes action).

If you run...
./pox.py samples.pretty_log --DEBUG openflow.of_01 --address=192.168.1.2 
--port=6633
.. the POX log should say that the switches have connected and pings shouldn't 
go through.  Yes?  No?

-- Murphy

On Dec 29, 2013, at 1:55 PM, Sayed Qaiser Ali Shah <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> Hello everybody,
> 
> I am using POX controller on my Laptop. I have installed OpenWRT on TP Link 
> 1043 nd. IP's of devices are as follows.
> WAN port of Tp Link to which Laptop (controller is attached) : 192.168.1.1
> IP of Laptop: 192.168.1.2
> 
> To assign different network to wireless devices
> I have assigned IP to wlan0 via ifconfig. i.e. ifconfig wlan0 192.168.2.1
> IP of PC1: 192.168.2.2
> IP of PC2: 192.168.2.3
> 
> I connected PC1 and PC2 to devices successfully. Controller was unplugged and 
> when I pinged PC2 from PC1 it was successful. But what I want is devices 
> don't ping when controller has not defined a rule for that flow and flow is 
> saved in AP.
> Note: I am getting packets (Logs) on controller but controller is not taking 
> any decision. I am running l2_learning just for checking by using command
> ./pox.py openflow.of_01 --address=192.168.1.2 --port=6633 
> forwarding.l2_learning samples.pretty_log.
> Please anybody help me out of this. I am stuck in this since last month.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards
> 
> Sayed Qaiser Ali Shah
> MSI
> NUST (SEECS)
> _______________________________________________
> openflow-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss

_______________________________________________
openflow-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss

Reply via email to