On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 04:15:08PM +0800, 张晨 wrote: > i know that of 1.5 support table entries to be synchrounised, but > should transition between different tables be supported?
What is a transition between different tables? > For example , before transition, table 0 for routing, table 1 for qos, > and after transition, i wanna table 0 for input ACL, and thus all the > previous routing entries in table 0 should be quickly packed for table > 1, and qos entries packed for table 2. What does "packed" mean? > Is it be necessary for OpenFlow spec to require switch to support an > optional "Flow-Transition(src tid, dst tid)" like message? Or FAWG has > already tried this? What would such a message do? (Is it a message or an action?) _______________________________________________ openflow-discuss mailing list openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
