On 07/06/2016 07:28 PM, Andrew Grimberg wrote: > Secondly, committers would _lose_ the verify rights as they would become > completely managed by Jenkins. The values would change from -1 .. +1 to > become -1 .. +2 > > Thirdly, committers would _lose_ the submit right. This would be > completely controlled by Jenkins based upon state transitions. > Effectively turning the "Approve +1" right that committers would be > gaining into what would effectively be a "conditionally submit this > code, provided all tests pass" operation.
While I like the overall idea, I certainly do not have enough faith in infrastructure and verification pipeline stability. I presume those test definitions will be in JJB, which means that when infra goes south (as it has numerous times over the past year) or a project goes AWOL (and looses its snapshot artifacts, for example), we are dead in the water with no options to move forward until whatever went wrong gets resolved -- which is a heavily PST-centric process and has taken days (and weeks) to complete on more than one occasion. I am sorry, but this proposal will need to show a serious long-term SLA before committers can be *asked* to relinquish these rights. Bye, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
