Anil’s proposed change has been merged on stable/boron. 6908 might require a few more cycles, since with only openflowplugin and no other applications, I do not see any problem in bringup of ports. Would require some help from netvirt also to understand the problem.
Thanks, -shuva From: Abhijit Kumbhare [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 7:34 AM To: An Ho; Kochba, Alon Cc: openflowplugin-dev; Anil Vishnoi; Luis Gomez; Colin Dixon; [email protected]; Jozef Bacigal; Shuva Jyoti Kar Subject: Re: openflowplugin blocker bug If I am not mistaken - I think Anil had backed out the following change: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6917. Not sure if it got merged Anil? About https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6908 - added Alon (as he has raised the priority to blocker yesterday). Alon - would like to check with you if you think it is OK to defer this bug (6908) to the next SR since we need to get this SR out and the investigation/fix by Shuva/Jozef may need a few days? On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 5:20 PM, An Ho <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi OPENFLOWPLUGIN Team, We would like to kindly request an update on these OPENFLOWPLUGIN Boron Blocker Bugs? Please let us know the ETA for a fix or if we should retarget the blocker bug for Boron-SR3 instead. Bug 6908 - failed to update port status - all new OVS ports fail from this point. Is this only for Carbon or does it apply to Boron-SR2 as well? Otherwise, we should retarget for Carbon. Bug 6917 - Flow matching function (operational flow reconciliation) is not stable. Luis reopened this bug on 12/08. Are there plans to fix it now, or can we retarget for Boron-SR3 for more time? Best Regards, An Ho [1] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6908 [2] https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7343
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
