On 22/04/18 10:01, Anil Vishnoi wrote: > > If we can make Ipv4Address.equals() final, we can define it in way, > which would prevent this sort of breakage happening again -- but > that is: > 1) a restriction on how generated code can be used > 2) a relatively high-risk change (is there anybody manually subclassing > generated classes?) > 3) probably not a 5-line patch implementation > > The question to the community is: > > Is that what we want MD-SAL Binding V1 to do Fluorine onwards? > > Weather report with these rationale would help. If community care, > they will understand the issue and raise their concern if any, if not, > it's mdsal committers decision.
I think you understand the Weather Item process, which is for integrating breaking work. This is a question about *embarking* on implementing a change, and the question has been asked. Let me ask you specifically: Does the proposed change address the problem you are perceiving and do you support it? Thanks, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
