Good people (committers) of openflowplugin, your Neon-MRI still fails in a full (not quick) build, and this is now blocking full build validation of futher patches on the topic.
https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/integration/job/integration-multipatch-test-neon/72/ failed in https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/integration-multipatch-test-neon/72/console.log.gz with: [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.5:check (analyze-compile) @ forwardingrules-manager --- [INFO] BugInstance size is 12 [INFO] Error size is 0 [INFO] Total bugs: 12 [INFO] Unread field: org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.applications.frm.impl.BundleFlowForwarder$BundleFlowCallBack.flowFuture [org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.applications.frm.impl.BundleFlowForwarder$BundleFlowCallBack] At BundleFlowForwarder.java:[line 223] URF_UNREAD_FIELD [INFO] Count of placeholder(3) is not equal to count of parameter(2) [org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.applications.frm.impl.BundleGroupForwarder$BundleUpdateGroupCallBack] At BundleGroupForwarder.java:[line 185] SLF4J_PLACE_HOLDER_MISMATCH [INFO] Count of placeholder(3) is not equal to count of parameter(2) [org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.applications.frm.impl.FlowForwarder$AddFlowCallBack] At FlowForwarder.java:[line 409] SLF4J_PLACE_HOLDER_MISMATCH [INFO] Unread field: org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.applications.frm.impl.FlowForwarder$AddFlowCallBack.future [org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.applications.frm.impl.FlowForwarder$AddFlowCallBack] At FlowForwarder.java:[line 380] URF_UNREAD_FIELD [INFO] Count of placeholder(3) is not equal to count of parameter(2) [org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.applications.frm.impl.FlowForwarder$UpdateFlowCallBack] At FlowForwarder.java:[line 454] SLF4J_PLACE_HOLDER_MISMATCH [INFO] Unread field: org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.applications.frm.impl.FlowForwarder$UpdateFlowCallBack.future [org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.applications.frm.impl.FlowForwarder$UpdateFlowCallBack] At FlowForwarder.java:[line 425] URF_UNREAD_FIELD [INFO] Format should be constant. Use placeholder to reduce the needless cost of parameter construction. see http://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#logging_performance [org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.applications.frm.impl.FlowNodeReconciliationImpl$ReconciliationTask$1] At FlowNodeReconciliationImpl.java:[line 501] SLF4J_FORMAT_SHOULD_BE_CONST [INFO] Count of placeholder(3) is not equal to count of parameter(2) [org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.applications.frm.impl.GroupForwarder$UpdateGroupCallBack] At GroupForwarder.java:[line 290] SLF4J_PLACE_HOLDER_MISMATCH [INFO] Format should be constant. Use placeholder to reduce the needless cost of parameter construction. see http://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#logging_performance [org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.applications.frm.impl.TableForwarder] At TableForwarder.java:[line 88] SLF4J_FORMAT_SHOULD_BE_CONST [INFO] Format should be constant. Use placeholder to reduce the needless cost of parameter construction. see http://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#logging_performance [org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.applications.frm.impl.TableForwarder] At TableForwarder.java:[line 116] SLF4J_FORMAT_SHOULD_BE_CONST [INFO] Null passed for non-null parameter of JobEntry.setResultFuture(Object) in org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.applications.frm.nodeconfigurator.NodeConfiguratorImpl$MainTask.runWithUncheckedExceptionLogging() [org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.applications.frm.nodeconfigurator.NodeConfiguratorImpl$MainTask] At NodeConfiguratorImpl.java:[line 147] NP_NULL_PARAM_DEREF_ALL_TARGETS_DANGEROUS [INFO] Possible null pointer dereference of result in org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.applications.frm.util.FrmUtil.getActiveBundle(InstanceIdentifier, ForwardingRulesManager) on exception path [org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.applications.frm.util.FrmUtil, org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.applications.frm.util.FrmUtil, org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.applications.frm.util.FrmUtil, org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.applications.frm.util.FrmUtil] Dereferenced at FrmUtil.java:[line 109]Null value at FrmUtil.java:[line 102]Known null at FrmUtil.java:[line 106]Known null at FrmUtil.java:[line 107] NP_NULL_ON_SOME_PATH_EXCEPTION Will you let us know when this is fixed, you have it locally passing and it's worth to kick off a new full build? Tx, M. -- Michael Vorburger, Red Hat vorbur...@redhat.com | IRC: vorburger @freenode | ~ = http://vorburger.ch On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 11:42 AM Stephen Kitt <sk...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Gobinath, > > To start a full multipatch build, reply to the patch with > > multipatch-build:topic=neon-mri > > I’ve done this for you, the build should start soon (and I’ll update > TSC-132 with the build link). > > Regards, > > Stephen > > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 09:30:05 +0000 > "Gobinath ." <gobin...@ericsson.com> wrote: > > > Hi Michael, > > I’ve addressed the mockito related test failures in the latest patch. > > I’m facing some single feature test failures though (mdsal related). > > Could you please run the multipatch full build on it. If it aint a > > pain could you please share the Jenkins cmd to run this build . > > > > Thanks an Regards, > > Gobinath > > > > From: Michael Vorburger [mailto:vorbur...@redhat.com] > > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 5:31 PM > > To: Anil Vishnoi <vishnoia...@gmail.com>; openflowplugin-dev > > <openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org>; Gobinath . > > <gobin...@ericsson.com> Cc: <t...@lists.opendaylight.org> > > <t...@lists.opendaylight.org>; Robert Varga <n...@hq.sk>; Kitt, > > Stephen <sk...@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] > > OPNFLWPLUG-1032 Neon-MRI: Bump odlparent, yangtools, mdsal > > > > Good people (committers) of openflowplugin, > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 2:44 AM Anil Vishnoi > > <vishnoia...@gmail.com<mailto:vishnoia...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Mon, > > Sep 17, 2018 at 3:03 PM Michael Vorburger > > <vorbur...@redhat.com<mailto:vorbur...@redhat.com>> wrote: Good > > people (committers) of openflowplugin, > > > > are you planning to work on > > https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/OPNFLWPLUG-1032 this week? Yes, > > we will push a patch this week. > > > > The latest mulitpatch full (not quick) build > > > https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/integration-multipatch-test-neon/58/console.log.gz > > failed with mockito related test problems in openflowplugin. Will you > > be able to address those ASAP, and let us know in reply on this > > thread when a new mulitpatch full build makes sense to retry? > > > > I have just realized it's, obviously, a (hard) dependency for then > > bumping genius and netvirt, ... > > > > If this is only started to be looked into during the week of Oct 1st > > - 5th, after the DDF / ONS in AMS next week, then I do not think that > > the "Version bump on October 6" mentioned in > > > https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2018/tsc/opendaylight-meeting-tsc.2018-09-13-16.00.html > > is realistic. > > > > Tx, > > M. > > -- > > Michael Vorburger, Red Hat > > vorbur...@redhat.com<mailto:vorbur...@redhat.com> | IRC: vorburger > > @freenode | ~ = http://vorburger.ch<http://vorburger.ch/> > > _______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev > > mailing list > > openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto: > openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org> > > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev > > > > > > -- > > Thanks > > Anil > >
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
