On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 11:30 -0300, minombresbond wrote: > +1 "libre fonts"
Maybe the thing to do is to focus on the difference... You can redistribute "libre" fonts (usually only under a compatible licence); you can use them on the Web; you can print with them; you can change them; you can redistribute changed versions; anyone can get the source for your changes. So, one could say "usable fonts", perhaps. It's probably not a good idea to focus on quality yet -- a trip to Adobe's or Linotype's font library gives a very different experience today. But we have fonts that don't have to stay inside your organization, or on only five CPUs (how many CPUs are there in my printer?) -- they are Fonts without Borders. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org