On Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 5:27:23 PM, Nicolas wrote:
NM> Le Mer 21 octobre 2009 16:14, Nicolas Spalinger a écrit : >> Font optimizer services like >> http://fonts.philip.html5.org/ already take that fact into account and >> handle the renaming when they generate a branch. >> If they absolutely need to keep the upstream name they can directly >> negotiate with upstream for permissions. NM> That's actually a good reason *not* to do woff. No, that's a reason to automatically, or on demand, serve a woff version as well with the same name. NM> If woff+ofl means renamed NM> fonts, and we start seeing web sites that use gentium (or another) in their NM> css rules but via another name, forcing download of gentium data when NM> perfectly fine gentium is already available locally, it will be a net loss. Agree that needless renaming would be a net loss here. -- Chris Lilley mailto:ch...@w3.org Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
