The onus is on open, not free. That seems to be in line with the oflb. It's secondary that the software is free (as in ££$$).
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 14:20 -0500, Barry Schwartz wrote: > > It's not at all clear that the site has anything to do with free > software. The name of the site adds to the confusion between openness > and freeness, so actually, I think, one may have to make a special > effort to get the point across that this is a free software site. > > Don't blame me for that being difficult to do; blame Captain Gnu. :) >
