vernon adams <v...@newtypography.co.uk> skribis: > There's a debate about on whether Ubuntu are failing the open source > ethos by not releasing the font until it's 'finished'.
That's just a problem in reading or speech comprehension. > Interestingly there's an argument that fonts can't practically be > released whilst in development (unlike other software) because it would > be difficult for the author & users to track changes etc. Perhaps some people are underestimating the hardship caused by program development, and thus see the hardship caused by font development as unique. (And I speculate that DEK had to beg people like me to upgrade their CM fonts on account of failure to upgrade your fonts being just about the least harmful failure to upgrade that one could do with a TeX installation, other than a minor bug fix.)
