2010/5/13 Trond Norbye <trond.nor...@gmail.com>: > > On 13. mai 2010, at 16.32, Patrick ALLAERT wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Sorry insisting about this, but would it be possible to examine my request ? >> > > It's an interesting idea, but it's kind of hard to implement.... You could > create your own tool that iterates through all symbol definitions and tries > to search for it. But this may return false responses because we could report > the function used, but it's used from a function that isn't used etc..
Indeed, the main goal won't be to have a complete and exhaustive list of unused symbols with context analyzing. What I'd like to achieve is having a list of symbols which returns only one result. This would obviously be the definition! In case of cleanup of unused legacy code in software applications, this function could be used iteratively. Do you have some pointers that could help me developing this? Regards, Patrick > Trond > > >> Thanks in advance, >> Kind regards, >> >> -- >> Patrick Allaert >> --- >> http://code.google.com/p/peclapm/ - Alternative PHP Monitor >> >> >> 2010/5/3 Patrick ALLAERT <patrickalla...@php.net>: >>> Hi list! >>> >>> Would it be possible to have a kind of listing of tokens being defined >>> but never used? >>> I'm thinking about searches using the "Symbol" field not returning >>> more results than when using the "Definition" one. >>> This would enable people to determine what methods are obsolete across >>> different projects. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> -- >>> Patrick Allaert >>> --- >>> http://code.google.com/p/peclapm/ - Alternative PHP Monitor >> _______________________________________________ >> opengrok-discuss mailing list >> opengrok-discuss@opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opengrok-discuss _______________________________________________ opengrok-discuss mailing list opengrok-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opengrok-discuss
