Jan Willamowius wrote:
> I like the feature, but maybe we should call the switch
> AcceptUnregisteredLRQ or something similar. Don't all LRQs come from a
> third party ?
>
Actually, "ThirdParty" sounds ok, as 1st and 2nd party implies "us",
neighborhood gatekeepers.
May I suggest "AcceptNonNeighbourLRQ" to make it even more explicit for
those that have not followed this discussion.
Thanks Simon.
Dimitris
PS. Jan, could you shed some light on why
[RoutingPolicy]
default=enum,explicit
will not work with ENUM records that return IP addresses?
>
> Simon Horne wrote:
>> The feature to accept LRQ's from non neighbors is included in the CVS.
>>
>> To activate
>> [RasSrv::LRQFeatures]
>> AcceptThirdPartyLRQ=1 {default is 0}
>>
>> Warning it is experimental.
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________________
Posting: mailto:[email protected]
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
