Hi,

And for [CapacityControl] -- h323id is already implemented .

[ip:CALLER_IP|h323id:CALLER_H323ID|cli:CALLER_NUMBER]=[CALLED NUMBER REGEX
PATTERN] MAX_CAPACITY

Best Regards,
//Tusar\\

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Zygmuntowicz Michal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Another solution would be to bill customers by IPs, not CLI.
> Anyway, h323id: extension to the RewriteCLI should be quite
> straightforward to implement and should not affect existing stuff.
> It could even be more correct/flexible to associate accounts with H.323
> IDs,
> not party A/party B numbers.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jan Willamowius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 3:54 PM
>
>
> > since all you are trying to do is authenticate by IP, why don't you
> > use [FileIPAuth] ? Then there is no need to mangle the CLI.
> >
> > I think your idea stretches the idea of "rewriting the CLI" even
> > further than we already do. Since we already have quite a number of
> > Rewrite sections that work on the destination number/alias, we could
> > also add something like "[RewriteSource]".
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jan
> >
> >
> > Tusar wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am currently managing my wholesale customer using CLI rewriting .
> Like
> >> any
> >> call from [192.168.20.5/192.168.20.6]
> >> is set to CLI=1234567890 and getting auth and accounting on
> [1234567890]
> >> and
> >> it is running superb . But problem
> >> is original CLI from my customer are rewritten and can not relay the
> >> original CLI to telco .
> >>
> >> [RewriteCLI]
> >> in:192.168.20.5=any=1234567890
> >> in:192.168.20.6=any=1234567890
> >>
> >> [CapacityControl]
> >> cli:1234567890=^1214 30
> >>
> >> Just a thought , All calls from specific IP(s) will be written as
> h323id
> >> where as original CLI will be
> >> intact, so that we can relay the original CLI to telco and auth/acc
> will
> >> be
> >> set based on h323id .
> >>
> >> [RewriteCLI]
> >> in:192.168.20.5=any=h323id:1234567890
> >> in:192.168.20.6=any=h323id:1234567890
> >>
> >> [CapacityControl]
> >> h323id:1234567890=^1214 30
> >>
> >> Do you have any plan to implement like this feature or is there any
> >> option
> >> already here which I am missing ?
> >>
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> //Tusar\\
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jan Willamowius, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.gnugk.org/
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
> Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
> Use priority code J8TL2D2.
>
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
> _______________________________________________________
>
> Posting: mailto:[email protected]
> Archive:
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
> Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________________

Posting: mailto:[email protected]
Archive: 
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

Reply via email to