Hi Leon,
I am no gnugk expert, but I kow a bit.
I am not sure from your description what you are trying to do.
Do you want to have a gnugk on a public address, and use it to service
clients at home/small sites sitting behind a NAT type router (such as a
linksys)?
Or, do you want to have the the the gungk sitting on a private address
behind a NAT router (like a linksys)?
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 12:24 +0000, Leon Li wrote:
> Anyone has an answer to this?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Leon
>
>
>
>
> From: Leon Li [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 June 2009 4:43 PM
> To: GNU Gatekeeper Users
> Subject: [Openh323gk-users] NAT traversal with GnuGK
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am wondering whether the following network topology will work with
> GnuGK.
>
>
>
> 1. Endpoints (Private) NAT box (e.g. Linksys Router) GnuGK
> (public or private IP) Cisco GK (public IP) NAT box Endpoint (private
> IP)
>
> 2. Endpoints (Private) NAT box (e.g. Linksys Router) GnuGK
> (public or private IP) Cisco GK (public IP) Endpoint (public IP)
>
>
>
> If yes, what do I need to configure on GnuGK?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Leon
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference!
Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250.
Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today!
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org
_______________________________________________________
Posting: mailto:[email protected]
Archive:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
