Hi Mikhail, I haven't used H.323 support in a Cisco 800, but the general advice is not to rely on H.323 helpers in NAT routers, but to place a GnuGk in front of the NAT router and to use the H.323's NAT traversal protocols (H.460.18/.19) instead.
Regards, Jan -- Jan Willamowius, Founder of the GNU Gatekeeper Project EMail : [email protected] Website: http://www.gnugk.org Support: http://www.willamowius.com/gnugk-support.html Relaxed Communications GmbH Frahmredder 91 22393 Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Jan Willamowius HRB 125261 (Amtsgericht Hamburg) USt-IdNr: DE286003584 Michael Ivanov wrote: > Greetings! > > I am new to h323 technologies and gnukg in particular. I have managed to set > up > gnugk in our internal lan and now trying to allow external access to it. We > have > a cisco series 800 router with h323 gateway functionality (but no gatekeeper; > at > least show gatekeeper command is not recognized). This router is used as a NAT > firewall between our internal LAN and internet. show gateway command reports > that > cisco gateway is registered with our internal gatekeeper. > > My question is, do I still need to forward all h323 related ports > (1718...1720, > 3000, 3001 and all TCP/UPD port ranges specified in gnugk config) explicitely > to > gatekeeper PC or should cisco gateway provide proper commmunication to gnugk > somehow? > When I try to register to cisco router specifying it as a server, registration > succeeds but gnugk service does not show any new registrations. > > Best regards, > -- > \ / | | > (OvO) | Mikhail Iwanow | > (^^^) | | > \^/ | E-mail: [email protected] | > ^ ^ | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:[email protected] Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
