Posted on behalf of Adrian Midgley ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 7:53 AM Subject: Re: Intermediate schema, was Re: Synapses/SynEx vs. OIO > Posting to the openhealth-list is restricted to list subscribers. > > Your original message follows. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Although I can appreciate the benefits of having an intermediate > common representation, I just don't see how it is absolutely > necessary. > > Absolute, in theory, no... but in the real world, yes, essential. > > Wayne did the proper explanation, can I just throw in the minimalist > one:- > > n-1 vs n**2 > > <grin> > -- > Midgley
- Intermediate schema, was Re: Synapses/SynEx vs. OIO Andrew po-jung Ho
- Re: Intermediate schema, was Re: Synapses/SynEx vs.... Wayne Wilson
- Re: Intermediate schema, was Re: Synapses/SynEx vs.... Andrew po-jung Ho
- Re: Intermediate schema, was Re: Synapses/SynEx... Thomas Beale
- Fw: Intermediate schema, was Re: Synapses/SynEx vs.... Joseph Dal Molin
- Fw: Intermediate schema, was Re: Synapses/SynEx vs.... Andrew po-jung Ho
- Re: Intermediate schema, was Re: Synapses/SynEx vs.... Wayne Wilson
- Re: Intermediate schema, was Re: Synapses/SynEx... Wayne Wilson
- Re: Intermediate schema, was Re: Synapses/SynEx vs.... Andrew po-jung Ho
- Re: Intermediate schema, was Re: Synapses/SynEx... Wayne Wilson
- Re: Intermediate schema, was Re: Synapses/SynEx vs.... Andrew po-jung Ho
