> For myself, and for our clients, I try to select the best tool for the job
> every time, and to do it rationally.
>
> The tools and the platform selection here seem reasonable. I think a case
Interesting. So, what is the rationale behind selecting a less reliable,
less standardized, less popular, and more expensive product? What is it
exactly that can't be done with for example Apache? What exactly are the
benefits of IIS/NT in a web server environment?
I chose my tools by functionality as well, and I am not biased against
Microsoft products just because they are Microsoft.
This email is written on Outlook Express, because I like the user interface
and functionality of it. It is sent with qmail from a Linux server, and your
mail was received by fetchmail - because these two tools are doing a more
reliable, transparent & flexible job than Exchange.
Horst
