It was Sherlock Holmes, I believe, who said, "Eliminate the
impossible, and whatever remains, however improbable, is the truth."
As I survey the field of open source medical software, I see the
impossible with one improbable exception: VistA.
I hypothesize that unless the open source community embraces VistA
(embraces meaning starts throwing coding resources at it big time)
that there will never be open source medical solutions. Not at the
rate things are going now.
At our hospital it was Cerner versus VistA. Cerner won. Had there
been a vibrant, interested, critically massed open source community
surrounding VistA, VistA would have won.
Please recall that VistA is installed in every VA hospital and is
beloved by users. Please recall also that today the VA is
acknowledged to be at the forefront of patient safety initiatives,
for example, barcode scanning of medications at the point of care.
Should the open source community really ignore this open source
initiative in medicine because it isn't C++ or Java? Should the open
source community pretend that VistA is just another front end/back
end/other end that can be connected with everything else with .Net or
CORBA?
You make the call. Patients are dying while you decide (ref IOM, etc.).
(This posting is loosely in response to Dan's posting)
- Re: Sherlock Holmes John Gage
- Re: Sherlock Holmes Karsten Hilbert
- Re: Sherlock Holmes Tim Churches
- Re: Sherlock Holmes David Forslund
- Re: Sherlock Holmes Ignacio Valdes
- Re: Sherlock Holmes Andrew Ho
- Re: Sherlock Holmes John Gage
- The VistA Thing Bruce Slater, MD
- Re: The VistA Thing Alexander Caldwell
- Re: The VistA Thing Walt Biggs
- Re: The VistA Thing Alexander Caldwell
