On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 15:50, John S Gage wrote:
> I find it odd that a psychiatrist should be against dialog.
> 
> 

Good point John.

LOL! Especially *THAT one*.



> On Saturday, March 29, 2003, at 03:09 PM, Andrew Ho wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Adrian Midgley wrote:
> >
> >> I would class the AAFP project as following the model that SUN
> >> followed very successfully with Open Office.
> >
> > Adrian,
> >
> > Obviously, the AAFP is quite different from Sun. Furthermore, there is 
> > no
> > Microsoft Office-equivalent EMR to surpass.
> >
> > According to David Kibbe's abstract published during the recent eGov
> > conference in Washington D.C.:
> >
> > ------ begin quote
> > Wednesday 3/19/2003, Continental Ballroom, 11:00-12:30 pm
> >
> > David C. Kibbe
> >
> > Open Source Electronic Health Record for Office-Based Medical Practice
> >
> > Abstract:
> >
> >   The American Academy of Family Physician is dedicated to identifying
> > practical solutions to address America's health care system's
> > shortcomings, and believes the time has come to meet head-on the need 
> > for
> > electronic health records systems in the office of member physicians. 
> > This
> > project envisions the establishment of a new, non-profit entity - the
> > Health Information Foundation - which will acquire, at no cost, the 
> > rights
> > to an existing, state-of-art Internet-based electronic health care 
> > record,
> > and will develop the additional components necessary to make this the
> > leading clinical interface and EHR system in office-based health care,
> > with a projected one thousand medical practice users by the end of 
> > 2003,
> > increasing to ten thousand by the end of 2004.
> >
> > ---------- end quote
> >
> >> I believe there would not be disagreement if anyone said we are in
> >> general strongly in favour of their exercise and well-disposed to it.
> >
> > I don't think it helps any of us to get in their way - but some 
> > skepticism
> > is certainly well-justified. Their "model" may even change over time. I
> > think we should let them work on this for awhile, then review their
> > progress. :-)
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Andrew
> > ---
> > Andrew P. Ho, M.D.
> > OIO: Open Infrastructure for Outcomes
> > www.TxOutcome.Org
> >
> 

Reply via email to