openhealth-list  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Definition of terms Thomas Beale
  • Re: Definition of terms Aidan M McGuire
  • Re: Definition of terms Aidan M McGuire
  • Re: Definition of terms Thomas Beale
  • Re: Definition of terms Richard Schilling
• A little article on a hospital using Linux Paul . Sherman
  • Re: A little article on a hospital using Linux Daniel L. Johnson
  • Re: A little article on a hospital using Linux Wayne Wilson
  • Re: A little article on a hospital using Linux Elpidio Latorilla
• INN drug list for download? Horst Herb
• Re: CCOW and OpenCMA David Forslund
  • Re: CCOW and OpenCMA Horst Herb
• interesting: IBM Linux Client Migration Cookbook J. Antas
  • Re: interesting: IBM Linux Client Migration Cookbook Karsten Hilbert
  • RE: interesting: IBM Linux Client Migration Cookbook Calle Hedberg
  • Re: interesting: IBM Linux Client Migration Cookbook Martin van den Bemt
• Fwd: Open source DICOM and healthcare software site J. Antas
• UKK OSS watch conference Adrian Midgley
• mfxLinux: for medical offices Adrian Midgley
• interesting: Tips for webmasters of health related sites J. Antas
• free/open-source software booth at TEPR 2005 Andrew Ho
  • Re: free/open-source software booth at TEPR 2005 Etienne Saliez
• CCOW open source tools? Joseph Dal Molin
  • Re: CCOW open source tools? J. Antas
  • Re: CCOW open source tools? Tim Cook
  • Re: CCOW open source tools? Joseph Dal Molin
  • Re: CCOW open source tools? - "Care-Team-Role-Based-Access-Control" Etienne Saliez
• Saddened to hear of the tragedy K.S. Bhaskar
  • Re: [Hardhats-members] Saddened to hear of the tragedy Dr Molly Cheah
• Re: Open source tools for population health epidemiology and public health Hermant
• Open source tools for population health epidemiology and public health Tim Churches
  • Re: Open source tools for population health epidemiology and public health David Forslund
  • Re: Open source tools for population health epidemiology and public health Tim Cook
  • Re: Open source tools for population health epidemiology and public health David Forslund
  • Re: Open source tools for population health epidemiology and public health Heitzso
  • Re: Open source tools for population health epidemiology and public health Tim Churches
  • Re: Open source tools for population health epidemiology and public health Tim Churches
  • Re: Open source tools for population health epidemiology and public health David Forslund
  • Re: Open source tools for population health epidemiology and public health Tim Churches
  • Re: Open source tools for population health epidemiology and public health David Forslund
  • Re: Open source tools for population health epidemiology and public health Tim Churches
• Open Source Pre-Operative Management System Bruce Slater
• interesting: "Server-Based Wide Area Data Replication for Disaster Recovery" J. Antas
• CCR and open source David Derauf
  • Re: CCR and open source will ross
  • RE: CCR and open source David Derauf
  • Linux Medical News Stuff. Ignacio Valdes
• Printing faxes to a sigle file Pat
  • Re: Printing faxes to a sigle file Joseph Dal Molin
  • Re: Printing faxes to a sigle file Pat
  • Re: Printing faxes to a sigle file Horst Herb
  • Re: Printing faxes to a sigle file Don Grodecki
• Rural Health Grant Bruce Slater
  • Re: Rural Health Grant will ross
  • Re: Rural Health Grant - "You are not alone ... ", CRISNET in Belgium Etienne Saliez
  • Re: Rural Health Grant Ignacio Valdes
  • Re: Rural Health Grant Daniel L. Johnson
  • Re: Rural Health Grant will ross
  • Re: Rural Health Grant David Forslund
  • Re: Rural Health Grant Adrian Midgley
• Radiology informatics Paul Nagy
  • Re: Radiology informatics Dr Molly Cheah
• FOIA access to source phrasing Adrian Midgley
  • RE: FOIA access to source phrasing Beza, Fil
• Federal office VistA coming Daniel L. Johnson
  • Re: Federal office VistA coming Joseph Dal Molin
  • Re: Federal office VistA coming Andrew Ho
  • Re: Federal office VistA coming lakew...@copper.net
  • RE: Federal office VistA coming Tomlinson, Steven B
  • Re: Federal office VistA coming will ross
  • Re: Federal office VistA coming Don Grodecki
  • Re: Federal office VistA vendor identy Daniel L. Johnson
  • Re: Federal office VistA vendor identy Joseph Dal Molin
  • Re: Federal office VistA vendor identy Daniel L. Johnson
  • Re: Federal office VistA vendor identy Joseph Dal Molin
  • Re: Federal office VistA vendor identy Wayne Wilson
  • RE: Federal office VistA vendor identy David Derauf
  • Re: Federal office VistA coming Dr Molly Cheah
  • RE: Federal office VistA coming K.S. Bhaskar
  • Re: Federal office VistA coming Bruce Slater
• interesting: The mistakes of version 1.0 J. Antas
• Dutch National Institute for ICT in Healthcare organises meeting on open source software in healthcare Bud P. Bruegger
• The Pro-Am Revolution Tim Cook
• RE: RTF conversion David Forslund
  • Re: RTF conversion Tim Churches
• Free US ICD-9-CM as plain text? Tim Churches
  • Re: Free US ICD-9-CM as plain text? Tim Churches
  • Re: Free US ICD-9-CM as plain text? Pat
  • Re: Free US ICD-9-CM as plain text? Tim Churches
  • Re: Free US ICD-9-CM as plain text? David Forslund
  • Re: Free US ICD-9-CM as plain text? Tim Churches
  • Re: Free US ICD-9-CM as plain text? Alexander Caldwell
  • Re: Free US ICD-9-CM as plain text? Tim Churches
  • Re: Free US ICD-9-CM as plain text? David Forslund
  • Re: Free US ICD-9-CM as plain text? Wayne Wilson
  • Re: Free US ICD-9-CM as plain text? David Forslund
• Another crazy software patent application Tim Churches
  • Re: Another crazy software patent application Tim Churches
  • Re: Another crazy software patent application Thomas Beale
• A Barcode Generator in Pure Postscript J. Antas
• Re: VA Software Could Help Establish Affordable EHR Systems World wide Jim Self
  • Re: VA Software Could Help Establish Affordable EHR Systems World wide Joseph Dal Molin
  • Re: VA Software Could Help Establish Affordable EHR Systems World wide David Forslund
• [Fwd: [discuss] Flaming and the design of social software] Joseph Dal Molin
• A patent application covering EHRs Tim Churches
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs Tim Cook
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs David Forslund
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs Tim Cook
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs Tim Churches
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs Andrew Ho
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs David Forslund
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs Andrew Ho
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs David Forslund
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs Tim Churches
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs Tim Churches
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs Andrew Ho
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs Tim Churches
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs Tim Churches
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs Thomas Beale
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs Daniel L. Johnson
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs Andrew Ho
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs David Forslund
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs Tim Churches
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs David Forslund
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs Tim Churches
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs Thomas Beale
  • when published spec predates patent, was Re: A patent application covering EHRs Andrew Ho
  • Re: when published spec predates patent, was Re: A patent application covering EHRs Tim Churches
  • Re: when published spec predates patent, was Re: A patent application covering EHRs David Forslund
  • Re: when published spec predates patent, was Re: A patent application covering EHRs Andrew Ho
  • Re: when published spec predates patent, was Re: A patent application covering EHRs Tim Churches
  • Re: when published spec predates patent, was Re: A patent application covering EHRs Pat
  • Re: when published spec predates patent, was Re: A patent application covering EHRs Elpidio Latorilla
  • Re: when published spec predates patent, was Re: A patent application covering EHRs Tim Churches
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs Tim Churches
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs will ross
  • Re: A patent application covering EHRs Tim Churches
  • RE: A patent application covering EHRs Paul . Sherman
• RE: VA Software Could Help Establish Affordable EHR Systems World wide Paul . Sherman
  • Re: VA Software Could Help Establish Affordable EHR Systems World wide Joseph Dal Molin
• VA Software Could Help Establish Affordable EHR Systems Worldwide David Derauf
  • Re: VA Software Could Help Establish Affordable EHR Systems Worldwide Wayne Wilson
  • Re: VA Software Could Help Establish Affordable EHR Systems Worldwide Joseph Dal Molin
• Dr. Weed's Software Cure J. Antas
• Interesting take on the UK NHS-Microsoft deal Tim Churches
• Almost open-source Haitian HIV EMR in this week's BMJ Tim Churches
• 40m GBP given to MS for NHS interface R&D Tim Cook
  • Re: 40m GBP given to MS for NHS interface R&D Tim Churches
  • NHS & MS - The New Deal Tim Cook
  • Re: [os-wg] NHS & MS - The New Deal Ignacio Valdes
  • Re: [os-wg] NHS & MS - The New Deal Tim Cook
  • Re: [os-wg] NHS & MS - The New Deal David Guest
  • Re: [os-wg] NHS & MS - The New Deal Joseph Dal Molin
  • Re: [os-wg] NHS & MS - The New Deal Ignacio Valdes
  • Re: [os-wg] NHS & MS - The New Deal Calle Hedberg
  • Re: [os-wg] NHS & MS - The New Deal Ignacio Valdes
  • Re: [os-wg] NHS & MS - The New Deal Tim Churches
  • Re: NHS & MS - The New Deal Wayne Wilson
  • Re: NHS & MS - The New Deal David Guest
  • Re: 40m GBP given to MS for NHS interface R&D Horst Herb
  • RE: 40m GBP given to MS for NHS interface R&D Cooper Paul (RTF) NHCT
• Ann: OpenPortalGuard Bud P. Bruegger
• spam problem, Re: Andrew Ho
  • Re: spam problem, Re: Joseph Dal Molin
  • list moderation going back to Brian Bray Bud P. Bruegger
  • RE: spam problem, Re: Paul . Sherman
• Re: physician prescribing tool development (fwd) Andrew Ho
• Re: Hi Tim Churches
  • email address harvested, was Re: Hi Andrew Ho
• Unidentified subject! guy_fisher
  • RE: Unidentified subject! Sherman, Paul (CEOSH)
• FUD-busting (and a fact check please) Adrian Midgley
  • Re: FUD-busting (and a fact check please) Martin van den Bemt
• NHS/IA revisionism Adrian Midgley
  • Re: NHS/IA revisionism lakew...@copper.net
  • Re: NHS/IA revisionism Wayne Wilson
  • Re: NHS/IA revisionism Joseph Dal Molin
  • Re: NHS/IA revisionism Andrew Ho
  • RE: NHS/IA revisionism Tim Churches
  • 100+ year perspective, was RE: NHS/IA revisionism Andrew Ho
  • RE: 100+ year perspective, was RE: NHS/IA revisionism Tim Churches
  • Re: NHS/IA revisionism Andrew Ho
  • RE: NHS/IA revisionism Tim Churches
  • RE: NHS/IA revisionism Tim Churches
  • RE: NHS/IA revisionism Andrew Ho
  • Re: NHS/IA revisionism Adrian Midgley
  • rationale for closed source development, was Re: NHS/IA revisionism Andrew Ho
  • OGC OSS report (was) Re: NHS/IA revisionism Joseph Dal Molin
  • RE: OGC OSS report (was) Re: NHS/IA revisionism Tim Churches
  • Re: OGC OSS report (was) Re: NHS/IA revisionism Adrian Midgley
  • RE: OGC OSS report (was) Re: NHS/IA revisionism Tim Churches
  • Re: OGC OSS report (was) Re: NHS/IA revisionism Wayne Wilson
  • Pro-Linux report sexed down by government (was Re: OGC OSS report) K.S. Bhaskar
• Growth data to generate pediatric growth charts Joseph Dal Molin
• Dimagi? Tim Churches
  • Re: Dimagi? Tim Churches
• Re: Virtual Privacy Machine and USB speed David Forslund
• Non-definitive-but-useful comparison of MS-Windows vs Linux security Tim Churches
• RE: Virtual Privacy Machine - reprise Tim Churches
  • Medical Record Location(s) was: Virtual Privacy Machine - reprise Tim Cook

• Earlier messages
• Later messages