Tim Cook wrote: > On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 10:33 +0100, Christian Heller wrote: > > However, I think it is time to accept a citation of Wikipedia, > > for example. Many profs claim that it were not "scientific" enough. > > Wikipedia is not peer-reviewed in any formal process. "All" professors > should claim it is not scientific enough. That said, I do think most of > the information there is quite accurate....but I still use caution and > NEVER use it for reference. > > > > Don't you (ALL) think we badly need an Open Source and > > > Free Journal in our domain. I strongly feel this must > > [..] > > > > There is one: http://www.josmc.org/ > > There is an online, peer-reviewed, free medical/health journal that is > indexed and carries an (estimated) 2.0 impact factor: > http://www.jmir.org/?JMIR_Home:Why_choose_JMIR%3F > > They are also offering to provide support for a new journal if you are > ready to start one. See the website above for details. > > You can also submit relevant research information to OpenClinical for > publication; http://www.openclinical.org/home.html Though I doubt it > will count for your publication requirements for your degree???
What is wrong with BioMed Central medical Informatics and Decision Making? It is peer-reviewed and indexed in Medline. Fully open access. If your university is a member then you won't have to pay any author fees. If not, the charges are about teh same as for JMIR, I think. See http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmedinformdecismak/ Tim C Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openhealth/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
