Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
> Relying on process and testing as a means of achieving software
> quality is an admission of defeat
Um, are you suggesting that the undefeated write software which is
always completely defect-free, without the need for any form of process
and testing?
I agree that slavish, mindless adherence to process is not a substitute
for putting one's brain in gear and really thinking through the issues
of software quality. But I can't conceive of any approach to software
quality that doesn't involve testing.
No testing? Now that IS a dangerous idea!
Tim C
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openhealth/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
