http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2007/05/07/bisb0507.htm

Expensive - by UK standards - if they don't take the adverts.

I suspect that the licencing model is such that when the company folds,
the software goes away, or alternative and likely more expensive ways of
supporting what by then will be a practice asset will be imposable upon
users.


Whereas with an open source model, none of this applies.

Who is an AMA member who could write to the journal?
-- 
Midgley

Reply via email to