Michael> It was not specified due to the lack of standards for
Michael> higher-level service management which partitioning is
Michael> classified. Given there is an OpenSM effort in flight
Michael> and the Service ID spec is already in existence, it isn't
Michael> that tough to acquire an IP service ID (or any other
Michael> protocol that one wants to support) and implement a
Michael> solution along the lines that I describe above. This
Michael> would lead to a more dynamic environment while reducing
Michael> the impact to the administrator.
This scheme might indeed be reasonable. However, given the absence of
an IBTA spec or IETF draft, I don't see how we can rely on it in our
IPoIB driver right now.
Thanks,
Roland
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general