Hal> The only reason I requested this was for the transition
Hal> period to minimize the duplication of changes as I am
Hal> presuming you will want to continue your branch. Maybe that
Hal> is an incorrect assumption (or presumption).
No, it is correct. I am planning on continuing to work on IPoIB to
get it to a mergable state.
Hal> I'm not adverse to a new tree (in fact, openib-candidate
Hal> would work as a this branch if it gets filled in.) but was
Hal> trying to minimize the work until the phase 1 work was far
Hal> enough along. I suspect that will take a little time.
Hal> Who would be responsible for duplicating any mthca changes
Hal> (and other layers like IPoIB) ?
I would assume the MAD integration branch would be fairly short-lived
and wouldn't need many changes pulled in. Whoever owned the branch
(you and/or Sean) would be responsible for merging whatever you
want/need onto the branch (and conversely I would need to continue to
merge anything relevant onto my branch).
I am guessing that Sean and I will be responsible for the various
pieces of the trunk that we eventually create.
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
