On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:18:47 -0700 "Fab Tillier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Sean Hefty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 4:09 PM > > > > Does anyone have a preference which order request/response MADs complete? > > Sends first always? Receives first always? Whatever is convenient? > > > > The only reason I can think of to report receives before sends is to support > user-mode. If a receive can't be reported to a user-mode client, then the > corresponding send should not carry a status value that would indicate that > a receive was - it should be over-ridden to indicate something equivalent to > a timeout since the receive will not be delivered. Looking at how the implementation is coming out, reporting receives before sends is a little easier than sends before receives. (A send may still have active work requests when a response is received.) So I will make this the behavior for the MAD layer. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
