Roland> I think keeping the MAD code simpler is probably best right now.
Hal> Hope that is for technical reasons and not for the recent missteps.
Yes, it's just that the MAD code is quite complicated already with
multiple tests for DR SMPs etc; mad.c alone is over 2000 lines now. I
don't think you could even find a microbenchmark that could measure
the improvement in testing the response bit in the MAD code rather
than calling into process_mad for every packet, so I don't think we
need to add more code to the MAD layer to do it.
- R.
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
