Hello! Quoting r. Hal Rosenstock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Re: [openib-general] [PATCH] process_mad extension": > On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 10:18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > While I was at it, I saw what seems like a small bug: when local_completions > > generates a wc, the port number field was uninitialised. > > Yes, that is a bug (but would only show up if this is used on a switch > (as wc.port_num is only valid for DR SMPs on switches) which has not yet > been done yet as far as I know). Can you test this ? >
Unfortunately, I dont have a switch running the gen2 stack now :) Well, anyway, if my patch goes in, it gets fixed as a side-effect. mst _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
