On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 02:36 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Hello! > Quoting r. Tom Duffy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Re: Re: mstflint - test3": > > On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 11:18 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > I think I fixed this now. Pls try again. > > > > This is using an unpatched mtcr.h. Looks good. > > > > tat:~# ./mstflint -d /proc/bus/pci/0000\:81/00.0 q > > Image type: FailSafe > > Chip rev.: A1 > > GUIDs: d05f760901c90200 d15f760901c90200 d25f760901c90200 > > 50d0000100c90200 > > Board ID: Cougar C > > > > -tduffy > > Actually, no, now that I look into it hard enough, GUIDs are likely wrong - > almost everyone assigns running numbers to GUIDs. > Could you please dump the GUIDs that mthca reports? > > Try this for example: > > cat /sys/class/infiniband/mthca0/sys_image_guid > > If this does not match, we still have endian-ness trouble.
For some reason, this is what they are... tat:~# cat /sys/class/infiniband/mthca0/sys_image_guid 50d0:0001:00c9:0200 tat:~# cat /sys/class/infiniband/mthca0/node_guid d05f:7609:01c9:0200 See also the attached picture from ibsmgui.
<<attachment: guid.jpg>>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
