Hal> Don't we want to be a little bit careful here in terms of Hal> being able to continue to derive patches on the pieces Hal> already submitted to kernel.org until we decide this is ready Hal> to go forward ? (Guess that might be when these build patches Hal> would be applied).
Tom> Well, I don't think the Makefiles ore Kconfig's will be Tom> changing for upstream submission, so as long as Roland is Tom> careful to only diff .[ch] files that are already in lkml, it Tom> shouldn't be a big deal. I think for the ease of use for Tom> everybody that we plumb in cm and sdp.
Agreed. It's pretty easy for me to keep Kconfig/Makefile changes straight now that we have the current stuff upstream. I see no problem with hooking up the CM and SDP. (BTW it looks like SDP should select the CM once there is a CM config option; also the SDP dependency on INET is redundant because IPOIB alread depends on that)
Libor, if you want to include the changes for the CM as part of your SDP changes, feel free to do so. Otherwise, I will submit a patch for the CM as soon as possible.
- Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
