On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 02:39:21PM -0800, Tom Duffy wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 14:20 -0800, Libor Michalek wrote:
> > Here's a patch for the print format warning in the debug data path.
>
> OK, good. Thanks. Now clean on x86_64 with data debug on. Still
> seeing these on sparc64:
Tom,
This patch should clear up all the warnings, can you give it
a try and let me know if it works.
Thanks.
-Libor
Index: sdp_write.c
===================================================================
--- sdp_write.c (revision 1799)
+++ sdp_write.c (working copy)
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
sdp_dbg_warn(conn,
"No IOCB on write complete <%llu:%d:%d>",
- comp->wr_id,
+ (unsigned long long)comp->wr_id,
sdp_desc_q_size(&conn->w_snk),
sdp_desc_q_size(&conn->send_queue));
Index: sdp_rcvd.c
===================================================================
--- sdp_rcvd.c (revision 1799)
+++ sdp_rcvd.c (working copy)
@@ -1310,7 +1310,8 @@
if (comp->wr_id != buff->wrid) {
sdp_dbg_warn(conn, "work request ID mismatch. <%llu:%llu>",
- comp->wr_id, buff->wrid);
+ (unsigned long long)comp->wr_id,
+ (unsigned long long)buff->wrid);
result = -ERANGE;
goto drop;
Index: sdp_read.c
===================================================================
--- sdp_read.c (revision 1799)
+++ sdp_read.c (working copy)
@@ -172,7 +172,8 @@
if (comp->wr_id != buff->wrid) {
sdp_dbg_warn(conn, "work request mismatch <%llu:%llu>",
- comp->wr_id, buff->wrid);
+ (unsigned long long)comp->wr_id,
+ (unsigned long long)buff->wrid);
(void)sdp_buff_pool_put(buff);
result = -EPROTO;
Index: sdp_actv.c
===================================================================
--- sdp_actv.c (revision 1799)
+++ sdp_actv.c (working copy)
@@ -382,7 +382,8 @@
if (id != conn->plid) {
sdp_dbg_warn(conn, "Path record ID mismatch <%016llx:%016llx>",
- id, conn->plid);
+ (unsigned long long)id,
+ (unsigned long long)conn->plid);
goto done;
}
@@ -409,7 +410,9 @@
}
sdp_dbg_ctrl(conn, "Path record lookup complete <%016llx:%016llx:%d>",
+ (unsigned long long)
cpu_to_be64(path->dgid.global.subnet_prefix),
+ (unsigned long long)
cpu_to_be64(path->dgid.global.interface_id),
path->dlid);
/*
Index: sdp_pass.c
===================================================================
--- sdp_pass.c (revision 1799)
+++ sdp_pass.c (working copy)
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@
sdp_dbg_ctrl(NULL,
"CM REQ. comm <%08x> SID <%016llx> ca <%s> port <%d>",
- cm_id->local_id, cm_id->service_id,
+ cm_id->local_id, (unsigned long long)cm_id->service_id,
event->param.req_rcvd.device->name,
event->param.req_rcvd.port);
/*
Index: sdp_sent.c
===================================================================
--- sdp_sent.c (revision 1799)
+++ sdp_sent.c (working copy)
@@ -448,8 +448,8 @@
*/
sdp_dbg_warn(conn,
"Send wrid mismatch. <%llu:%llu:%d>",
- comp->wr_id,
- buff->wrid,
+ (unsigned long long)comp->wr_id,
+ (unsigned long long)buff->wrid,
conn->send_usig);
result = -EINVAL;
goto drop;
@@ -536,8 +536,9 @@
sdp_dbg_warn(conn,
"Send processing mismatch. <%llu:%llu:%d:%d>",
- comp->wr_id, current_wrid, free_count,
- conn->send_usig);
+ (unsigned long long)comp->wr_id,
+ (unsigned long long)current_wrid,
+ free_count, conn->send_usig);
result = -EINVAL;
goto done;
}
Index: sdp_event.c
===================================================================
--- sdp_event.c (revision 1799)
+++ sdp_event.c (working copy)
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
*/
sdp_dbg_warn(conn, "Event <%d:%llu:%u:%u:%u> ignored in state",
comp->status,
- comp->wr_id,
+ (unsigned long long)comp->wr_id,
comp->opcode,
comp->byte_len,
comp->imm_data);
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
sdp_dbg_warn(conn, "ABORT on error <%d> event <%u:%llu:%u:%u>",
result,
comp->status,
- comp->wr_id,
+ (unsigned long long)comp->wr_id,
comp->opcode,
comp->byte_len);
/*
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
